Medicine · 2016
Neo-digit functional reconstruction of mutilating hand injury using transplantation of multiple composite tissue flaps.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Li Xiucun, Cui Jianli, Maharjan Suraj, Yu Xin, Lu Laijin, Gong Xu
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Functional reconstruction of mutilating hand injuries poses a challenge to the surgeon. We present our experience with use of multiple composite tissue flaps transplant for functional reconstruction of hand in patients with mutilating hand injuries. The associated merits and demerits of these surgical approaches are briefly discussed.
METHODS: From August 2004 to October 2014, functional reconstruction of hand with transplantation of multiple composite tissue flaps was performed in 8 patients. These included the toe with dorsal pedis artery flap, the reverse posterior interosseous artery flap, and the anterolateral thigh flap. Mean interval from injury to functional reconstruction was 10.6 days.
RESULTS: All transplanted skin flaps and reconstructed neofingers survived completely. Only 1 patient developed wound infection at the recipient site (hand), which resolved without any debridement or revision surgery. At the donor site (foot), partial skin necrosis was observed in 1 patient, which healed with local wound care. In other patients, all wounds healed without any complications. The average range of movement at the neofinger metacarpophalangeal and interphalangeal joints was 38° and 73°, respectively. None of the patients required revision surgery.
CONCLUSION: Use of negative pressure wound therapy and multiple composite tissue flap transplantation appears to be an effective strategy for hand functional reconstruction in patients with mutilating hand injuries. Among the multiple composite tissue flaps, use of toe transplantation combined with reverse posterior interosseous artery flap appears to be the best option.
METHODS: From August 2004 to October 2014, functional reconstruction of hand with transplantation of multiple composite tissue flaps was performed in 8 patients. These included the toe with dorsal pedis artery flap, the reverse posterior interosseous artery flap, and the anterolateral thigh flap. Mean interval from injury to functional reconstruction was 10.6 days.
RESULTS: All transplanted skin flaps and reconstructed neofingers survived completely. Only 1 patient developed wound infection at the recipient site (hand), which resolved without any debridement or revision surgery. At the donor site (foot), partial skin necrosis was observed in 1 patient, which healed with local wound care. In other patients, all wounds healed without any complications. The average range of movement at the neofinger metacarpophalangeal and interphalangeal joints was 38° and 73°, respectively. None of the patients required revision surgery.
CONCLUSION: Use of negative pressure wound therapy and multiple composite tissue flap transplantation appears to be an effective strategy for hand functional reconstruction in patients with mutilating hand injuries. Among the multiple composite tissue flaps, use of toe transplantation combined with reverse posterior interosseous artery flap appears to be the best option.