MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3389/fcimb.2025.1563940

Медицинская библиотека · Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025

Investigating antibiotics in the NICU and patient safety.

Lawrence Shelley M, Wynn James L, Kimberlin David W, Cantey Joseph B

СтатьяОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

In recent years, a number of observational studies have been published in neonatology-focused journals that modify American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) evidence-based guidelines, as outlined in the Red Book and other publications authored by the AAP Committee on the Fetus and Newborn and the AAP Committee on Infectious Diseases, for the treatment of neonatal infectious diseases. Specifically, studies that decrease the treatment length or advocate for the early transition of intravenous to oral antibiotics in all neonates with suspected or culture-positive sepsis or pneumonia should be regarded with caution. These studies are usually conducted through quality improvement initiatives without informed parental consent, and lack well-defined definitions for the infection of interest. They often fail to include sufficient information regarding well-documented variations in gestational age-based immune responses, and usually combine bacterial infections into a single group without considering virulence and pathophysiologic differences between gram-negative and gram-positive infections. We seek to raise awareness of the potential harm these practices may cause and to advocate for parental involvement and consent when deviations from practice standards are investigated.

Для цитирования: Lawrence Shelley M, Wynn James L, Kimberlin David W, Cantey Joseph B. Investigating antibiotics in the NICU and patient safety.. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology. 2025. DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2025.1563940.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.