The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research · 2021
Excessive gestational weight gain during the week prior to delivery as a predictor of maternal life-threatening complications in preeclamptic women.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Morikawa Mamoru, Saito Yoshihiro, Mayama Michinori, Noshiro Kiwamu, Nakagawa-Akabane Kinuko, Umazume Takeshi, Chiba Kentaro, Watari Hidemichi
Аннотация
AIM: To investigate the relationship between excessive gestational weight gain during the week prior to delivery (GWG) and severe morbidity and pregnancy termination among pregnant women with preeclampsia (hypertension with proteinuria).
METHODS: We compared GWG, laboratory data, and complication(s) between 94 preeclamptic women (preeclampsia group) with singleton pregnancies who delivered at ≥22 gestational weeks and 188 healthy women (control group) with singleton pregnancies undergoing elective cesarean deliveries. The gestational weeks at delivery were matched in the preeclampsia and control groups.
RESULTS: Among 282 total participants, median of GWG was significantly higher in the preeclampsia group than in the control group (1.6 kg vs. 0.5 kg, p < 0.0001). Furthermore, the GWG cutoff value for the preeclampsia group was 1.6 kg. The odds ratio for morbidity of preeclampsia among the women with GWG ≥1.6 kg at delivery was 12.5 (95% confidence interval, 6.31-24.5). In the preeclampsia group, 47 women with GWG ≥1.6 kg had significantly higher risks of hypoproteinemia, proteinuria, and renal dysfunction than those of 47 women with GWG < 1.6 kg. While, multivariate analysis showed 1.5 kg was a GWG cutoff value for predicting maternal morbidity (p < 0.0001); preeclamptic women with GWG ≥1.5 kg had a significantly higher risk of pulmonary edema than preeclamptic women with GWG < 1.5 kg (odds ratio, 7.77; 95% confidence interval, 1.64-36.7).
CONCLUSION: Excessive GWG in women with preeclampsia might be a predictor for severe maternal life-threatening complications requiring pregnancy termination.
METHODS: We compared GWG, laboratory data, and complication(s) between 94 preeclamptic women (preeclampsia group) with singleton pregnancies who delivered at ≥22 gestational weeks and 188 healthy women (control group) with singleton pregnancies undergoing elective cesarean deliveries. The gestational weeks at delivery were matched in the preeclampsia and control groups.
RESULTS: Among 282 total participants, median of GWG was significantly higher in the preeclampsia group than in the control group (1.6 kg vs. 0.5 kg, p < 0.0001). Furthermore, the GWG cutoff value for the preeclampsia group was 1.6 kg. The odds ratio for morbidity of preeclampsia among the women with GWG ≥1.6 kg at delivery was 12.5 (95% confidence interval, 6.31-24.5). In the preeclampsia group, 47 women with GWG ≥1.6 kg had significantly higher risks of hypoproteinemia, proteinuria, and renal dysfunction than those of 47 women with GWG < 1.6 kg. While, multivariate analysis showed 1.5 kg was a GWG cutoff value for predicting maternal morbidity (p < 0.0001); preeclamptic women with GWG ≥1.5 kg had a significantly higher risk of pulmonary edema than preeclamptic women with GWG < 1.5 kg (odds ratio, 7.77; 95% confidence interval, 1.64-36.7).
CONCLUSION: Excessive GWG in women with preeclampsia might be a predictor for severe maternal life-threatening complications requiring pregnancy termination.