MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1080/00015458.2004.11679614

Медицинская библиотека · Acta chirurgica Belgica · 2004

Experience with benign splenic disease.

Melissas J, de Bree E, Schoretsanitis G, Tsiftsis D D

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: In the ongoing effort to improve patient treatment, a deeper understanding of the symptomatology, physical signs and management options of rare splenic, non-traumatic, benign diseases is extremely important.

PATIENTS AND

METHODS

The records of eight consecutive patients with benign splenic conditions, other than injury and abscess, were reviewed retrospectively in order to analyse the clinical presentation, diagnostic methodology and therapeutic procedures applied in these rare conditions. Of the eight patients, three were diagnosed with splenic hydatid cyst, two with pseudocysts, one with splenic epidermoid cyst, one with wandering spleen and one with infraction of an ectopic spleen with situs inversus of other intra-abdominal organs.

RESULTS

Upper abdominal pain was the most common presenting symptom and a tender palpable mass in the left upper abdominal quadrant, the predominant clinical finding. Pre-operative CT scanning confirmed the diagnosis in six patients, but failed to reveal the splenic pathology in the remaining two cases. Seven patients underwent splenectomy while saving splenic parenchyma was feasible in only one patient (12,5%).

CONCLUSIONS

Splenic, non-traumatic, benign diseases have vague clinical presentation and may create diagnostic difficulties. Although spleen saving intervention can be applied in selected cases, splenectomy would be required in most patients.

Для цитирования: Melissas J, de Bree E, Schoretsanitis G, Tsiftsis D D. Experience with benign splenic disease.. Acta chirurgica Belgica. 2004. DOI: 10.1080/00015458.2004.11679614.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.