Obstetrics and gynecology · 2006
Use of intrauterine device in the setting of uterus didelphys.
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Espey Eve, Ogburn Tony, Hall Rebecca, Byrn Francis
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Uterine anomalies are frequently diagnosed in reproductive-aged women and are generally considered a contraindication to the use of intrauterine contraception. We elected to offer this method to a woman with uterus didelphys and a poorly controlled seizure disorder who wished to avoid hormonal and barrier contraceptives.
CASE: A 17-year-old woman (gravida 1, para 1) with a seizure disorder desired an intrauterine device (IUD). She was found to have uterus didelphys and a complete vaginal septum. After obtaining informed consent, an IUD was placed in each uterine horn. The patient retained both IUDs and was satisfied with the method 9 months after IUD insertion.
CONCLUSION: Intrauterine contraception should be considered an option for women with uterine anomalies on a case-by-case basis.
CASE: A 17-year-old woman (gravida 1, para 1) with a seizure disorder desired an intrauterine device (IUD). She was found to have uterus didelphys and a complete vaginal septum. After obtaining informed consent, an IUD was placed in each uterine horn. The patient retained both IUDs and was satisfied with the method 9 months after IUD insertion.
CONCLUSION: Intrauterine contraception should be considered an option for women with uterine anomalies on a case-by-case basis.