MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s00586-002-0396-8

Медицинская библиотека · European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2002

Traumatic bilateral locked facet at L4-5: report of a case associated with incorrect use of a three-point seatbelt.

Mori Kanji, Hukuda Sinsuke, Katsuura Akitomo, Saruhashi Yasuo, Asajima Shuzo

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

We present a case of traumatic L4-5 bilateral facet dislocation, without neurological deficit, in a 32-year-old female patient, as an unusual seatbelt injury caused by positioning the shoulder harness improperly under her armpit. Open reduction, posterior interbody fusion, and posterior segmental instrumentation were carried out. The aim of this report is to describe this rarely encountered condition and speculate regarding automotive shoulder harness misuse as a potential cause of bilateral locked facet at L4-5, and to emphasize the importance of multidirectional X-ray on first examination. The unusual L4-5 level facet interlocking was attributed to misuse of the automobile shoulder harness. We propose the importance of recognizing this injury and following up on such clues as transverse process fractures and/or widened posterior elements.

Для цитирования: Mori Kanji, Hukuda Sinsuke, Katsuura Akitomo, Saruhashi Yasuo, Asajima Shuzo. Traumatic bilateral locked facet at L4-5: report of a case associated with incorrect use of a three-point seatbelt.. European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society. 2002. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-002-0396-8.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.