MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jcms.2007.04.002

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery · 2007

Cranioplasty for repair of a large bone defect in a growing skull fracture in children.

Vignes Jean-Rodolphe, Jeelani N u Owase, Dautheribes Michel, San-Galli François, Liguoro Dominique

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

In infants, calvarial defects are generally repaired with autologous grafts. However, with large defects, these techniques can be associated with complications such as bone graft resorption, loss of blood, or local infection. Alternative materials are available for cranioplasty including metals or acrylic.

CASE REPORT: We report the case of a 3.2kg boy who had a traumatic vaginal delivery and developed a growing skull fracture resulting in a large cranial defect (50cm(2)). We describe a specific technique of cranioplasty by interposing a titanium plate between the duroplasty and bone elements, without fixation, with autologous bone fragments deposited over the mesh. Long-term follow-up was satisfactory.

CONCLUSION

For large skull defects in infants, the technique described affords protection to the intracranial components, induces osteogenesis in a growing cranial skeleton, and provides satisfactory aesthetic results.

Для цитирования: Vignes Jean-Rodolphe, Jeelani N u Owase, Dautheribes Michel, San-Galli François, Liguoro Dominique. Cranioplasty for repair of a large bone defect in a growing skull fracture in children.. Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. 2007. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2007.04.002.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.