MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/0003489416646116

Медицинская библиотека · The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology · 2016

Penetrating Neck Trauma: An Unusual Case Presentation and Review of the Literature.

McCrary Hilary C, Nielsen Tyson J, Goldstein Stephen A

Клинический случайСтатьяОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this report is to describe a case of a retained projectile metal object to the neck that occurred after airbag deployment during a motor vehicle accident.

METHODS

Case report with literature review.

RESULTS

After a motor vehicle accident on the interstate, a 19-year-old man presents to the emergency department for several open extremity fractures, a neck laceration, and a C1 lateral mass fracture. The trauma surgery team repaired the neck laceration with no further evidence of injury. Several weeks later on follow-up, the patient presents with dysphagia and pain when turning his head to the right. A repeat computed tomography angiography (CTA) scan revealed a metallic foreign body in the left posterior pharyngeal, prevertebral soft tissues, which was subsequently removed during exploratory surgery 2 months after his initial accident.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first report, to our knowledge, of a projectile metal object to the neck that may be related to airbag deployment. The car involved in this accident was under recall for airbags that were associated with projectile objects, which warrants further investigation into the possible risks of such airbags.

Для цитирования: McCrary Hilary C, Nielsen Tyson J, Goldstein Stephen A. Penetrating Neck Trauma: An Unusual Case Presentation and Review of the Literature.. The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology. 2016. DOI: 10.1177/0003489416646116.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.