MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1081/jdi-120028557

Медицинская библиотека · Renal failure · 2004

Low prevalence of restless legs syndrome in patients with advanced chronic renal failure in the Indian population: a case controlled study.

Bhowmik Dipankar, Bhatia Manvir, Tiwari Sumeet, Mahajan Sandeep, Gupta Sanjay, Agarwal Sanjay K, Dash Suresh C

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is reported to occur in 20-70% of uremic patients. There is no study from India regarding the prevalence of RLS in chronic renal failure (CRF) patients. Studies from other Asian countries have shown a much lower prevalence compared to the West. This study investigated the prevalence of RLS in patients with advanced CRF in the Indian population.

PATIENTS AND

METHODS

Sixty-five CRF patients and 99 controls were evaluated using a predesigned standard questionnaire. The control group consisted of prospective renal donors.

RESULTS

The mean age of our patients was 42.4 +/- 14.9 years as compared to 43.7 +/- 11.2 years (p = NS). The distribution of cause of CRF was as follows: diabetes 38.5%, hypertension 13.9%, chronic interstitial nephritis 29.2% and chronic glomerulonephritis 18.4%. RLS was present in 1 patient (1.5%) and none of the controls.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of RLS in CRF patients in India is very low as compared to the Western population.

Для цитирования: Bhowmik Dipankar, Bhatia Manvir, Tiwari Sumeet, Mahajan Sandeep, Gupta Sanjay, Agarwal Sanjay K, Dash Suresh C. Low prevalence of restless legs syndrome in patients with advanced chronic renal failure in the Indian population: a case controlled study.. Renal failure. 2004. DOI: 10.1081/jdi-120028557.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.