Vasodilators for persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn: A network meta-analysis.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES
To compare the efficacy and safety of different vasodilators in the treatment of persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn (PPHN) by a Bayesian network meta-analysis.
METHODS
We searched databases (Cochrane, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science) from January, 1990 up to December, 2023. Randomized controlled trials on the use of vasodilators in the treatment of PPHN. We extracted details of population, intervention, and outcome indicators. R and STATA software were used for data analysis. Sixteen articles were included, encompassing 776 neonates with PPHN. Among them, 12 articles were included in the quantitative analysis. The vasodilators included Sildenafil, Bosentan, Milrinone, Magnesium, Adenosine, and Tadalafil.
RESULTS
The Bayesian network meta-analysis results suggested that compared to placebo, Milrinone [OR = 0.125, 95% CI (0.0261, 0.562)], Sildenafil [OR = 0.144, 95% CI (0.0428, 0.420)], and Sildenafil_Milrinone [OR = 0.0575, 95% CI (0.00736, 0.364)] reduced the mortality, but the difference among the three was not significant. There was also no significant difference in the incidence of hypotension, the duration of mechanical ventilation, and the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation among the vasodilators. Compared to Bosentan, Adenosine was more effective in reducing the oxygenation index [MD = -12.78, 95% CI (-25.56, -0.03)], and Magnesium was less effective in reducing the oxygenation index than Sildenafil [MD = 5.19, 95% CI (1.23, 9.2)].
CONCLUSIONS
Milrinone, Sildenafil, and Sildenafil_Milrinone reduced the mortality of neonates with PPHN. More clinical trials are needed to verify the efficacy and safety of vasodilators in the treatment of PPHN.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.