Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2026
Do Early Aortic Remodelling Patterns at 6 Months Predict Mid-Term Outcomes After Frozen Elephant Trunk for Chronic Aortic Dissection?
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Akita Sho, Tokuda Yoshiyuki, Tamenishi Akinori, Matsumura Yasumoto, Hayakawa Akitaka, Mutsuga Masato
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether CT within 6 months after total arch replacement (TAR) with a frozen elephant trunk (FET) for chronic aortic dissection predicts mid-term outcomes and informs the timing of distal treatment.
METHODS: We analysed 56 consecutive patients who underwent TAR with FET at 2 centres (2009-2022) and had evaluable 6-month postoperative CT. Early remodelling was defined as the change from baseline to 6 months in the maximal outer-to-outer diameter of the proximal descending thoracic aorta at Level A (Ishimaru zone 3, 20 mm distal to the left subclavian artery, measured on centreline-orthogonal reconstructions). Patients were classified as early positive remodelling (EPR; no increase or a decrease) or early negative remodelling (ENR; ≥1-mm increase). Prespecified outcomes were distal aortic reintervention, distal stent graft-induced new entry (dSINE), and overall survival.
RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 5.4 years (standard deviation 3.7). Distal reintervention was required in 36/56 patients (64%). At 5 years, freedom from distal reintervention was higher with EPR than with ENR (44.6% vs 6.2%; P = .003). dSINE occurred in 26/56 patients (46.4%); 5-year dSINE-free survival was 65.1% (95% CI, 39.6-81.9) with EPR versus 18.2% (95% CI 5.9-35.2) with ENR (P = .008). Overall, 5-year survival for the cohort was 80.0% (95% CI 64.7-89.2). Among ENR patients, 5-year survival was 0% with conservative management versus 40.5% with distal intervention (P < .001); within EPR, 5-year survival was 65.9% with conservative management versus 85.7% with reintervention (P = .210).
CONCLUSIONS: A 6-month CT provides simple, actionable risk stratification after TAR with FET for chronic aortic dissection. Absence of EPR identifies a high-risk subgroup (ENR) that warrants closer surveillance and timely distal intervention, optimizing follow-up intensity and treatment timing.
METHODS: We analysed 56 consecutive patients who underwent TAR with FET at 2 centres (2009-2022) and had evaluable 6-month postoperative CT. Early remodelling was defined as the change from baseline to 6 months in the maximal outer-to-outer diameter of the proximal descending thoracic aorta at Level A (Ishimaru zone 3, 20 mm distal to the left subclavian artery, measured on centreline-orthogonal reconstructions). Patients were classified as early positive remodelling (EPR; no increase or a decrease) or early negative remodelling (ENR; ≥1-mm increase). Prespecified outcomes were distal aortic reintervention, distal stent graft-induced new entry (dSINE), and overall survival.
RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 5.4 years (standard deviation 3.7). Distal reintervention was required in 36/56 patients (64%). At 5 years, freedom from distal reintervention was higher with EPR than with ENR (44.6% vs 6.2%; P = .003). dSINE occurred in 26/56 patients (46.4%); 5-year dSINE-free survival was 65.1% (95% CI, 39.6-81.9) with EPR versus 18.2% (95% CI 5.9-35.2) with ENR (P = .008). Overall, 5-year survival for the cohort was 80.0% (95% CI 64.7-89.2). Among ENR patients, 5-year survival was 0% with conservative management versus 40.5% with distal intervention (P < .001); within EPR, 5-year survival was 65.9% with conservative management versus 85.7% with reintervention (P = .210).
CONCLUSIONS: A 6-month CT provides simple, actionable risk stratification after TAR with FET for chronic aortic dissection. Absence of EPR identifies a high-risk subgroup (ENR) that warrants closer surveillance and timely distal intervention, optimizing follow-up intensity and treatment timing.