The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology · 2025
Risk Factors for Antepartum Haemorrhage in Women With Placenta Praevia.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Treffers A, Reynoldson O, Beckmann M
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Placenta praevia (PP) is a significant obstetric complication associated with antepartum haemorrhage (APH) and adverse maternal and fetal outcomes. Identifying risk factors for APH in women with PP is important for guiding management decisions.
AIMS: This study aimed to identify risk factors associated with APH amongst women admitted to a single tertiary hospital with PP.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was undertaken, utilising data from the hospital's maternity dataset (2007-2021) and included publicly funded women with PP after 24 weeks gestation. Exclusions comprised multiple pregnancies, fetal abnormalities, intra-uterine fetal death and deliveries at other hospitals. Baseline characteristics, outcomes and potential risk factors for APH were analysed through bivariate and stepwise logistic regression.
RESULTS: Of the 430 cases with PP, 112 (26%) were admitted with APH. Of these, 45 had two or more admissions with APH, constituting 40% of the APH cohort. Those requiring admission were more likely to deliver at an early gestation, and their baby required nursery admission. Factors independently associated with APH included a higher number of previous caesarean sections, parity, Caucasian ethnicity and major PP.
CONCLUSIONS: Most women with PP will not require an admission with APH. In considering inpatient versus outpatient management, multiparous Caucasian women with a major PP appear more likely to be at risk of APH admission and premature delivery. These findings underscore the importance of tailoring clinical decision-making.
AIMS: This study aimed to identify risk factors associated with APH amongst women admitted to a single tertiary hospital with PP.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was undertaken, utilising data from the hospital's maternity dataset (2007-2021) and included publicly funded women with PP after 24 weeks gestation. Exclusions comprised multiple pregnancies, fetal abnormalities, intra-uterine fetal death and deliveries at other hospitals. Baseline characteristics, outcomes and potential risk factors for APH were analysed through bivariate and stepwise logistic regression.
RESULTS: Of the 430 cases with PP, 112 (26%) were admitted with APH. Of these, 45 had two or more admissions with APH, constituting 40% of the APH cohort. Those requiring admission were more likely to deliver at an early gestation, and their baby required nursery admission. Factors independently associated with APH included a higher number of previous caesarean sections, parity, Caucasian ethnicity and major PP.
CONCLUSIONS: Most women with PP will not require an admission with APH. In considering inpatient versus outpatient management, multiparous Caucasian women with a major PP appear more likely to be at risk of APH admission and premature delivery. These findings underscore the importance of tailoring clinical decision-making.