BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2024
Predictive modeling of gestational weight gain: a machine learning multiclass classification study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Victor Audêncio, Geremias Dos Santos Hellen, Silva Gabriel Ferreira Santos, Barcellos Filho Fabiano, de Fátima Cobre Alexandre, Luzia Liania A, Rondó Patrícia H C, Chiavegatto Filho Alexandre Dias Porto
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Gestational weight gain (GWG) is a critical factor influencing maternal and fetal health. Excessive or insufficient GWG can lead to various complications, including gestational diabetes, hypertension, cesarean delivery, low birth weight, and preterm birth. This study aims to develop and evaluate machine learning models to predict GWG categories: below, within, or above recommended guidelines.
METHODS: We analyzed data from the Araraquara Cohort, Brazil, which comprised 1557 pregnant women with a gestational age of 19 weeks or less. Predictors included socioeconomic, demographic, lifestyle, morbidity, and anthropometric factors. Five machine learning algorithms (Random Forest, LightGBM, AdaBoost, CatBoost, and XGBoost) were employed for model development. The models were trained and evaluated using a multiclass classification approach. Model performance was assessed using metrics such as area under the ROC curve (AUC-ROC), F1 score and Matthew's correlation coefficient (MCC).
RESULTS: The outcomes were categorized as follows: GWG within recommendations (28.7%), GWG below (32.5%), and GWG above recommendations (38.7%). The XGBoost presented the best overall model, achieving an AUC-ROC of 0.79 for GWG within, 0.76 for GWG below, and 0.65 for GWG above. The LightGBM also performed well with an AUC-ROC of 0.79 for predicting GWG within recommendations, 0.76 for GWG below, and 0.624 for GWG above. The most important predictors of GWG were pre-gestational BMI, maternal age, glycemic profile, hemoglobin levels, and arm circumference.
CONCLUSION: Machine learning models can effectively predict GWG categories, offering a valuable tool for early identification of at-risk pregnancies. This approach can enhance personalized prenatal care and interventions to promote optimal pregnancy outcomes.
METHODS: We analyzed data from the Araraquara Cohort, Brazil, which comprised 1557 pregnant women with a gestational age of 19 weeks or less. Predictors included socioeconomic, demographic, lifestyle, morbidity, and anthropometric factors. Five machine learning algorithms (Random Forest, LightGBM, AdaBoost, CatBoost, and XGBoost) were employed for model development. The models were trained and evaluated using a multiclass classification approach. Model performance was assessed using metrics such as area under the ROC curve (AUC-ROC), F1 score and Matthew's correlation coefficient (MCC).
RESULTS: The outcomes were categorized as follows: GWG within recommendations (28.7%), GWG below (32.5%), and GWG above recommendations (38.7%). The XGBoost presented the best overall model, achieving an AUC-ROC of 0.79 for GWG within, 0.76 for GWG below, and 0.65 for GWG above. The LightGBM also performed well with an AUC-ROC of 0.79 for predicting GWG within recommendations, 0.76 for GWG below, and 0.624 for GWG above. The most important predictors of GWG were pre-gestational BMI, maternal age, glycemic profile, hemoglobin levels, and arm circumference.
CONCLUSION: Machine learning models can effectively predict GWG categories, offering a valuable tool for early identification of at-risk pregnancies. This approach can enhance personalized prenatal care and interventions to promote optimal pregnancy outcomes.