MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.7759/cureus.97764

Медицинская библиотека · Cureus · 2025

Unicortical Versus Bicortical Screw Fixation for Medial Malleolus Fractures: A Retrospective Comparative Study.

Akram Muhammad Irfan, Kumar Vishal, Hasan Yaser, Sharfudeen Sharon Jafrin Surali

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Ankle fractures are common lower extremity injuries often involving the medial malleolus, a critical stabilizer of the ankle mortise. Screw fixation is the standard treatment, but the choice between unicortical and bicortical screw techniques remains debated. This retrospective study evaluates clinical outcomes of unicortical versus bicortical screw fixation in medial malleolus fractures over a four-year period at a Level 1 trauma center. In this study, 137 adult patients were included, with 95 undergoing unicortical fixation and 42 bicortical fixation. The primary outcome was early radiological union at three months. Delayed union rates were similar between groups (unicortical 9%, bicortical 7%, p=0.656). No significant differences in complications or secondary procedures were observed. Despite biomechanical advantages of bicortical screws, our data suggests comparable clinical effectiveness for both techniques. Further prospective studies with longer follow-up and functional outcomes are warranted.

Для цитирования: Akram Muhammad Irfan, Kumar Vishal, Hasan Yaser, Sharfudeen Sharon Jafrin Surali. Unicortical Versus Bicortical Screw Fixation for Medial Malleolus Fractures: A Retrospective Comparative Study.. Cureus. 2025. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.97764.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.