Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction · 2022
Live birth rate after cervicoisthmic cerclage in patients with previous late miscarriage and/or premature delivery.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Curtis Manon, Massoud Mona, Doret-Dion Muriel, Dubernard Gil, Huissoud Cyril, Gavanier Déborah, Golfier François, Bolze Pierre-Adrien
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: This study assesses the effectiveness of cervicoisthmic cerclage on the live birth rate, measured before and after performing this cerclage in a series of 62 patients with a history of late miscarriage and/or premature delivery.
STUDY DESIGN: All patients who underwent cervicoisthmic cerclage in one of the 3 university hospitals of the Hospices Civils de Lyon, between January 1, 2010, and April 1, 2019, and with a history of at least one late miscarriage or spontaneous premature birth, were included. Obstetrical and neonatal data for all pregnancies before and after cervicoisthmic cerclage were collected from medical records, completed by a phone call to patients in case of missing data.
RESULTS: We included 62 patients with a total of 224 pregnancies before and 95 pregnancies after cervicoisthmic cerclage. Forty-one (66%) cerclages were performed vaginally, 12 (19%) by laparotomy and 9 (15%) by laparoscopy. The live birth rate among all pregnancies evolving beyond 14 weeks was 23% before and 86% after cerclage (p < 0.01). The rate of delivery beyond 32 weeks was 13% before and 81% after cerclage, with a median term of delivery of 21 weeks and 37 weeks respectively. Twenty-two (35%) patients had at least one live birth before cerclage and 43 (69%) patients after cerclage. Five (8%) postoperative complications occurred (2 grade I, 2 grade II and 1 grade III).
CONCLUSION: The markedly high live birth rate when compared to before the cerclage strongly suggests a major role for the technique of cervicoisthmic cerclage in patients with a heavy obstetrical history.
STUDY DESIGN: All patients who underwent cervicoisthmic cerclage in one of the 3 university hospitals of the Hospices Civils de Lyon, between January 1, 2010, and April 1, 2019, and with a history of at least one late miscarriage or spontaneous premature birth, were included. Obstetrical and neonatal data for all pregnancies before and after cervicoisthmic cerclage were collected from medical records, completed by a phone call to patients in case of missing data.
RESULTS: We included 62 patients with a total of 224 pregnancies before and 95 pregnancies after cervicoisthmic cerclage. Forty-one (66%) cerclages were performed vaginally, 12 (19%) by laparotomy and 9 (15%) by laparoscopy. The live birth rate among all pregnancies evolving beyond 14 weeks was 23% before and 86% after cerclage (p < 0.01). The rate of delivery beyond 32 weeks was 13% before and 81% after cerclage, with a median term of delivery of 21 weeks and 37 weeks respectively. Twenty-two (35%) patients had at least one live birth before cerclage and 43 (69%) patients after cerclage. Five (8%) postoperative complications occurred (2 grade I, 2 grade II and 1 grade III).
CONCLUSION: The markedly high live birth rate when compared to before the cerclage strongly suggests a major role for the technique of cervicoisthmic cerclage in patients with a heavy obstetrical history.