MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s11701-015-0503-6

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of robotic surgery · 2015

Robotic versus laparoscopic resection for sigmoid diverticulitis with fistula.

Elliott Peter A, McLemore Elisabeth C, Abbass Mohammad A, Abbas Maher A

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Robotic abdominal surgery is growing despite a paucity of clinical reports to evaluate its impact on patient outcomes. In this retrospective case series, we aim to analyze our early experience with robotic resection in 11 consecutive patients with chronic colonic diverticulitis complicated by fistula to bladder, vagina, or skin and to compare the results of the robotic approach to 20 patients undergoing laparoscopic resection for the same indication. Our main outcome measures include operative time, blood loss, conversion rate, transfusion rate, hospital length of stay, complications, readmission, and fistula healing rate. In our study, we found robotic resection for colonic diverticulitis with fistula was technically feasible and yielded 100% fistula healing rate. The operative time, complication and readmission rates were similar to laparoscopy. A higher conversion rate, diverting stoma need, and longer hospital length of stay were noted in the robotic group; however, these findings could have been attributed to a higher number of cases involving rectal excision in the robotic group. Larger studies are needed to further examine the impact of robotic surgery on the outcome of patients with complicated chronic sigmoid diverticulitis.

Для цитирования: Elliott Peter A, McLemore Elisabeth C, Abbass Mohammad A, Abbas Maher A. Robotic versus laparoscopic resection for sigmoid diverticulitis with fistula.. Journal of robotic surgery. 2015. DOI: 10.1007/s11701-015-0503-6.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.