MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/ppul.24120

Медицинская библиотека · Pediatric pulmonology · 2018

Nasal high-frequency oscillatory ventilation and CO2 removal: A randomized controlled crossover trial.

Bottino Roberto, Pontiggia Federica, Ricci Cinzia, Gambacorta Alessandro, Paladini Angela, Chijenas Vladimiras, Liubsys Arunas, Navikiene Jurate, Pliauckiene Ausrine, Mercadante Domenica, Colnaghi Mariarosa, Tana Milena, Tirone Chiara, Lio Alessandra, Aurilia Claudia, Pastorino Roberta, Purcaro Velia, Maffei Gianfranco, Liberatore Pio, Consigli Chiara, Haass Cristina, Lista Gianluca, Agosti Massimo, Mosca Fabio, Vento Giovanni

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеРандомизированное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To compare short-term application of nasal high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (nHFOV) with nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP).

WORKING HYPOTHESIS: nHFOV improves CO2 removal with respect to nCPAP in preterm infants needing noninvasive respiratory support and persistent oxygen supply after the first 72 h of life.

STUDY

DESIGN

Multicenter non-blinded prospective randomized crossover study.

PATIENT SELECTION: Thirty premature infants from eight tertiary neonatal intensive care units, of mean ± SD 26.4 ± 1.8 weeks of gestational age and 921 ± 177 g of birth weight.

METHODOLOGY: Infants were randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to receive a starting treatment mode of either nCPAP or nHFOV delivered by the ventilator CNO (Medin, Germany), using short binasal prongs of appropriate size. A crossover design with four 1-h treatment periods was used, such that each infant received both treatments twice. The primary outcome was the mean transcutaneous partial pressure of CO2 (TcCO2 ) value during the 2-h cumulative period of nHFOV compared with the 2-h cumulative period of nCPAP.

RESULTS

Significantly lower TcCO2 values were observed during nHFOV compared with nCPAP: 47.5 ± 7.6 versus 49.9 ± 7.2 mmHg, respectively, P = 0.0007. A different TcCO2 behavior was found according to the random sequence: in patients starting on nCPAP, TcCO2 significantly decreased from 50.0 ± 8.0 to 46.6 ± 7.5 mmHg during nHFOV (P = 0.001). In patients starting on nHFOV, TcCO2 slightly increased from 48.5 ± 7.8 to 49.9 ± 6.7 mmHg during nCPAP (P = 0.13).

CONCLUSIONS

nHFOV delivered through nasal prongs is more effective than nCPAP in improving the elimination of CO2 .

Для цитирования: Bottino Roberto, Pontiggia Federica, Ricci Cinzia, Gambacorta Alessandro, Paladini Angela, Chijenas Vladimiras, Liubsys Arunas, Navikiene Jurate, Pliauckiene Ausrine, Mercadante Domenica, Colnaghi Mariarosa, Tana Milena, Tirone Chiara, Lio Alessandra, Aurilia Claudia, Pastorino Roberta, Purcaro Velia, Maffei Gianfranco, Liberatore Pio, Consigli Chiara, Haass Cristina, Lista Gianluca, Agosti Massimo, Mosca Fabio, Vento Giovanni. Nasal high-frequency oscillatory ventilation and CO2 removal: A randomized controlled crossover trial.. Pediatric pulmonology. 2018. DOI: 10.1002/ppul.24120.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.