MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.62347/fint4806

Медицинская библиотека · American journal of translational research · 2024

Meta-analysis of the effectiveness and safety of magnetic stimulation for chronic pelvic pain.

Li Huixiang, Yu Keqiang, Xue Ping, Xiang Jueying, Wu Jing

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To systematically assess the effectiveness and safety of magnetic stimulation (MS) for treating chronic prostatitis (CP) and chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CPPS) through a meta-analysis.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of databases including PubMed, The Cochrane Library, EMbase, VIP, Web of Science, WanFang, China Biology Medicine disc (CBMdisc), and China National Knowledge Internet (CNKI) databases was conducted to retrieve randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on MS interventions for CPPS from inception to the present. The search employed keywords such as "MS", "CPPS", and "prostatitis". Data analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 software, focusing on NIH-Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI), maximal urinary flow rate (Qmax), and international index of erectile function-5 (IIEF-5) score.

RESULTS

Eight RCTs involving 636 patients were included. Our meta-analysis revealed that extracorporeal MS significantly reduced NIH-CPSI scores [MD = -6.65; 95% CI (-8.15, -5.15), P < 0.00001] and improved Qmax [MD = 2.98; 95% CI (1.36, 4.59), P = 0.0003] compared to the control group. Although a trend toward improved IIEF-5 scores was observed [MD = 0.81; 95% CI (-0.34, 1.95), P = 0.17], the results were not significant.

CONCLUSION

MS is effective in alleviating clinical symptoms and enhancing Qmax in patients with CP/CPPS.

Для цитирования: Li Huixiang, Yu Keqiang, Xue Ping, Xiang Jueying, Wu Jing. Meta-analysis of the effectiveness and safety of magnetic stimulation for chronic pelvic pain.. American journal of translational research. 2024. DOI: 10.62347/fint4806.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.