The protective effect of roflumilast and ibuprofen on testicular ischemia reperfusion injury: An experimental study.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
The aim of the present study is to investigate the efficiency of roflumilast and ibuprofen in an experimental rat testicular ischemia reperfusion injury model in the light of histological and biochemical data.
METHODS
A total of 32 prepubertal male rats were randomly divided into four groups as G1: Control Group (testicular torsion/detorsion + saline (0.9% of 2 ml) was applied). G2: Sham Group only right scrotal incision was performed; G3: Ibuprofen Group (tes-ticular torsion/detorsion + ibuprofen administration); and G4 Roflumilast Group (testicular torsion/detorsion + roflumilast adminis-tration). Oxidative markers such as malondialdehyde (MDA), myeloperoxidase (MPO), total sulfhydryl (TSH), and nitrite (NO) levels as well as histopathological changes were analyzed.
RESULTS
Tissue MPO, MDA, and NO levels were significantly higher and TSH levels significantly lower in control group compared to sham group (p<0.001). The histopathologic scores of drug groups (Groups 3 and 4) were significantly lower than group 1 (p<0.001). In comparison of Group 3 and Group 4 with each other, the mean values of MPO and MDA were statistically significantly lower in Group 4 (p<0.001). A higher mean value of TSH was found in Group 3 without statistically significance (p=0.32). There was also an insignificant decrease in mean NO values of Group 3 compared to Group 4 (p=0.44). In comparison of drug groups, Group 4 had statistically insignificant better scores.
CONCLUSION
Our results indicate that administrating ibuprofen and roflumilast reduced testicular ischemia reperfusion injury in rat testis torsion model. In comparison, roflumilast is found to be more beneficial.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.