Pediatric surgery international · 2023
Saving the perineal body-A modification of the posterior sagittal anorectoplasty.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ostertag-Hill Claire A, Nandivada Prathima, Dickie Belinda Hsi
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Wound dehiscence of the anocutaneous anastomosis and/or reconstructed perineal body is a feared perioperative complication after posterior sagittal anorectoplasty (PSARP). Dehiscence of the perineal body can have long-term negative implications for fecal continence, sexual intimacy, obstetrical outcomes, and the need for reoperative surgery. We describe a modification to the traditional PSARP for repair of an imperforate anus with a rectovestibular, perineal, or absent fistula by sparing the perineal body, eliminating postoperative perineal body dehiscence and potentially improving long-term functional outcomes.
METHODS: A retrospective review of female patients with a rectovestibular, perineal, or absent fistula who underwent PSARP with sparing of the perineal body was performed.
RESULTS: Six patients underwent PSARP with sparing of the perineal body between 2019 and 2022. There were no perioperative complications. At follow-up, all patients are having regular bowel function without difficulty and have an excellent appearance of their perineal body.
CONCLUSIONS: PSARP for a rectovestibular, perineal, or absent fistula can be safely performed with a more limited incision to avoid disruption of the perineal body. This eliminates the need for perineal body reconstruction during the procedure, thereby preventing wound dehiscence. Given the significant long-term adverse sequelae of wound dehiscence and resultant inadequate perineal body, we believe this modification to the PSARP warrants strong consideration.
METHODS: A retrospective review of female patients with a rectovestibular, perineal, or absent fistula who underwent PSARP with sparing of the perineal body was performed.
RESULTS: Six patients underwent PSARP with sparing of the perineal body between 2019 and 2022. There were no perioperative complications. At follow-up, all patients are having regular bowel function without difficulty and have an excellent appearance of their perineal body.
CONCLUSIONS: PSARP for a rectovestibular, perineal, or absent fistula can be safely performed with a more limited incision to avoid disruption of the perineal body. This eliminates the need for perineal body reconstruction during the procedure, thereby preventing wound dehiscence. Given the significant long-term adverse sequelae of wound dehiscence and resultant inadequate perineal body, we believe this modification to the PSARP warrants strong consideration.