Comparison of bilateral and unilateral umbilical artery diastolic blood flow abnormalities in monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies.

Aim: Our study aimed to clarify the prognosis of bilateral and unilateral umbilical artery end-diastolic blood flow abnormalities (BFAs) in monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies.

Methods

Monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies were classified into bilateral (group 1), unilateral (group 2), and no (group 3) umbilical artery end-diastolic BFAs. After the usual obstetric management, short- and long-term prognoses were analyzed.

Results

A total of 171 monochorionic diamniotic twins were analyzed and classified into group 1 (13 twins, 7.6%), 2 (12 twins, 7.0%), and 3 (146 twins, 85.4%). Gestational age at delivery was significantly lower in group 1 than in groups 2 and 3 (median, 29.3, 35.6, and 35.6 weeks, respectively; p < .01 and p < .001). The survival rate of fetuses with BFAs was significantly lower in group 1 than in group 2 (23.0% [3/13] versus 100% [12/12]; p < .001). However, the survival rate of the co-twin was not significantly different between groups 1 and 2 (84.6% [11/13] versus 100% [12/12]; p = .48). The survival rate of both fetuses was significantly lower in group 1 than in groups 2 and 3 (53.8% [14/26], 100% [24/24], and 98.6% [288/292], respectively; both p < .001). In cases with fetal therapy, the survival rate of both fetuses tended to be lower in group 1 than in group 2 (44.4% [8/18] versus 83.3% [10/12]; p = .05). In cases without fetal therapy, the gestational age at delivery tended to lower in group 1 than in group 2 and was significantly lower than in group 3 (median, 29.1, 35.6, 35.6 weeks, respectively; p = .05 and p < .05). The survival rate of fetuses with BFA tended to be lower in group 1 than in group 2 (50.0% [2/4] versus 100% [12/12]; p = .05). The survival rate of the co-twin was not significantly different between groups 1 and 2 (100% [4/4] versus 100% [12/12]; p = 1). The survival rate of both fetuses tended to be lower in group 1 than in group 2 and was significantly lower than in group 3 (75% [6/8], 100% [24/24], and 99.2% [278/280], respectively; p = .05 and p < .01).

Conclusions

In monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies, bilateral umbilical artery end-diastolic BFAs demonstrated a poor prognosis. However, unilateral abnormalities exhibited a good prognosis similar to that in twins with normal umbilical artery blood flow. If such abnormalities are detected during a routine checkup, the umbilical artery pulse wave on the other side should be examined.