MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1186/1477-7800-3-33

Медицинская библиотека · International seminars in surgical oncology : ISSO · 2006

Secondary penile tumours revisited.

Cherian Jacob, Rajan Sreekumar, Thwaini Ali, Elmasry Yaser, Shah Tariq, Puri Rajiv

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To highlight the salient features of metastatic malignancies involving the penis, with special reference to the primary tumour sites, metastatic mechanisms, clinical features, differential diagnosis, treatment and prognosis.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of the literature was performed using MEDLINE and EMBASE, using the keywords 'penis', 'secondary malignancy', 'metastasis' and 'malignant priapism' to identify reviews and case reports of secondary penile malignancy. A case of rare clinical presentation of metastatic penile lesion is presented along with the review of the literature.

CONCLUSION

Secondary malignancy of the penis is a rare clinical entity, despite the rich vascularisation of this organ. The majority of metastatic lesions take their origin from the neighbouring genito-urinary organs, mainly prostate and bladder. These lesions are often associated with disseminated malignancy and hence have a poor outcome. Nodular or ulcerative lesions involving the corpora cavernosa or priapism are the main modes of clinical presentation. In most cases, only palliative or supportive therapy is indicated.

Для цитирования: Cherian Jacob, Rajan Sreekumar, Thwaini Ali, Elmasry Yaser, Shah Tariq, Puri Rajiv. Secondary penile tumours revisited.. International seminars in surgical oncology : ISSO. 2006. DOI: 10.1186/1477-7800-3-33.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.