DOI 10.1016/j.burns.2019.10.026
Characteristics and outcomes of patients with grill-related Burn injuries admitted to the Cologne Burn Center, Germany.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Grilling has become increasingly common in Germany. Although grilling is considered a non-negligible household burn hazard, few reports have assessed this type of injury. This study aimed to determine the patterns and characteristics of grill-related burn injuries and to compare these with other types of burn injuries.
METHODS
This retrospective observational study included all grill-related burn injuries admitted to Cologne Merheim Burn Center during 1989-2017. The collected data were analyzed descriptively and compared statistically with other fire injuries.
RESULTS
Of 1706 cases admitted with fire injuries during the study period, 160 (∼10%) involved grill-related injuries. Most cases (85%) involved men, with an average age of 34 years. Moreover, 48% and 38% of cases occurred in summer and spring, respectively. The most common mechanism of injury was ignition via fluid accelerant. The upper limb was the most commonly affected body part, followed by the head. Statistical analyses revealed that grill-related injuries were associated with a lower mean age and total body surface area, shorter in-hospital stay, and fewer complications than the other fire injury group.
CONCLUSION
Grill-related injuries are a relatively common cause of admission to the Cologne Burn Center. Although grill-related injuries underwent a less aggressive approach than the other investigated fire injuries, the former represent a public health concern because they mainly affect the upper body, with both psychologic and aesthetic consequences. We recommend a German nationwide multi-centric study of the patterns and characteristics of burn injury.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.