Introduction
Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is a neurological disorder with a hallmark pathophysiology of white matter injury caused by an autoimmune mediated inflammatory process. Patients can experience one or multiple progressive episodes of worsening MS symptoms which can range across a variety of neurological and cognitive domains ( Goldenberg, 2012 ). Although mediated by immunological processes, the damage to white matter also is thought to be associated with a redox imbalance or oxidative stress ( Ibitoye et al., 2016 ), and a corresponding decrease in the amount and function of antioxidants ( Sies and Cadenas, 1985 ), such as glutathione ( Dringen and Hirrlinger, 2003 ).
Current medical treatments generally target immune aspects of the disease with very few affecting oxidative stress. An exception is dimethyl fumarate (DFM) which is FDA-approved only for adults with relapsing forms of MS, and appears to work by mediating Nrf2-dependent and independent pathways ( Yadav et al., 2019 ). Nrf2 is an important transcription factor that is responsible for maintaining cellular redox homeostasis by increasing the transcription of genes that code for heme oxygenase−1 (HO−1), NAD(P)H dehydrogenase (quinone) 1(NQO1), glutathione-related enzymes, and superoxide dismutase. This results in reduced oxidative stress, increased antioxidant defenses, and the subsequent protection of neurons and oligodendrocytes ( Narapureddy and Dubey, 2019 ). Practically, DFM has important contraindications and monitoring requirements that suggest a need for exploration of other molecules that can function as antioxidants in patients with MS ( Xu et al., 2015 ).
N-acetylcysteine (NAC) has been a consideration to target oxidative stress in MS given its favorable safety profile, though the clinical data remains limited. We previously performed an exploratory study ( Monti et al., 2020 ) that included FDG PET imaging in 24 MS patients receiving a combination of intravenous and oral NAC using the same dosing regimen as in the present study (50 mg/kg IV NAC once per week and concomitant administration of 500 mg oral twice per day). It was found that NAC administration was associated with reported improvements in cognition and also resulted in increased cerebral glucose metabolism on FDG PET in the caudate, inferior frontal gyrus, lateral temporal gyrus, and middle temporal gyrus. Another small study (published as an abstract) of 15 MS patients found that oral NAC given 1250 mg three times per day for 4 weeks improved fatigue symptoms compared to a placebo control ( Krysko et al., 2019 ). A more recent randomized study of 54 MS patients found that oral NAC 600 mg twice per day resulted in decreased lipid peroxidation and improved anxiety symptoms in MS patients ( Khalatbari Mohseni et al., 2023 ).
Administration of NAC has been shown to increase glutathione levels in both animal models ( Vina et al., 1983 , Martínez-Banaclocha et al., 1997 ) and human studies ( Holmay et al., 2013 ), and reduce markers of oxidative damage in neurological conditions such as Parkinson’s disease ( Martínez-Banaclocha et al., 1999 , Khalatbari Mohseni et al., 2023 ). Directly measuring oxidative stress in the brain is challenging.
One proposed way of assessing brain effects from a treatment like NAC would be functional connectivity assessments, as measured by magnetic resonance imaging ( Petsas et al., 2019 ). It also has been suggested that this could be complemented by measuring changes in cerebral glucose metabolism, as measured by F−18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography [FDG PET] ( Kreisl et al., 2020 ). In the present study, we used both technologies and compared them with clinical assessments. Specifically, we utilized resting Blood Oxygen Level Dependent (BOLD) fMRI to assess functional connectivity pre and post intervention, which has been shown to be a promising biomarker for MS ( Dogonowski et al., 2016 , Faivre et al., 2016 , Tahedl et al., 2018 ). . For an additional level of functional neurological assessment we utilized FDG PET, conducted on an integrated PET-MRI platform. In MS research, structural MRI remains the principal imaging tool for identifying lesions and determining their activity, often through gadolinium enhancement. However, MRI alone provides limited insight into functional or metabolic alterations, and PET-CT does not allow for the simultaneous acquisition of PET and MRI data such as functional connectivity. Thus, PET-MRI offers a combined advantage, including MRI’s ability to explore functional connectivity changes with the ability of PET to characterize metabolic function.
Studies of FC in MS have revealed changes in a variety of structures and networks including the default mode network, salience network, and the frontoparietal network ( Bonavita et al., 2011 , Rocca et al., 2018 , Qu et al., 2026 ). Such changes in FC are related to the deterioration of the white matter tracts connecting different brain regions. Furthermore, the data correlating FC to cerebral metabolism is also substantial and indicates how excitatory and inhibitory connections can be affected by MS. If NAC is able to improve neuronal function and reduce the oxidative damage to white matter tracts, we anticipate that both FC and cerebral metabolism might be improved. While another fMRI metric, fALFF, relates to fluctuations in neuronal function within a region, there is less evidence in the literature of such alterations in MS and whether those alterations might be correlated with cerebral metabolism. Thus, we have focused on FC and cerebral glucose metabolism for the present study.
In summary, the importance of exploring the impact of NAC on functional connectivity and glucose metabolism is based on several prior findings and factors: 1) There is substantial evidence that FC is abnormal in patients with MS due to its impact on white matter tracts ( Kingwell, 2012 , Tahedl et al., 2018 , Rocca et al., 2022 ); 2) There is substantial evidence that FDG PET scans reveal abnormal brain metabolism in patients with MS including reductions in a number of cortical areas such as the prefrontal cortex, putamen, supplementary motor area, occipital regions, and pons ( Roelcke et al., 1997 , Bakshi et al., 1998 , Derache et al., 2006 ); 3) There is evidence that NAC has an impact on neuronal function ( Monti et al., 2020 , Monti et al., 2025 ); and, 4) There is a need to correlate changes in neuronal function as assessed by glucose metabolism and functional connectivity.
Materials and Methods
Overview
Written informed consent, approved by the Institutional Review Board of Thomas Jefferson University, was obtained from all subjects and the study was registered on clinicaltrials.gov with the following identifier: NCT03032601 . Subjects were recruited from local neurology offices and also from the local community through meetings with MS support groups in the area. To be enrolled, subjects had to meet the standard clinical diagnosis of either relapsing remitting or progressive MS along with the following inclusion criteria: Age 21–80 years old and on a stable treatment regimen for at least one month that did not change throughout the treatment period. Patients were excluded if they had any intracranial abnormalities or any medical, neurological (other than MS), or psychiatric disorder that could reasonably be expected to interfere with the assessment of MS symptoms, or with any of the study assessments including the PET-MRI scan results.
To assess symptoms and response to the NAC, patients completed a qualitative evaluation of their symptoms using the 36-Item Short Form Survey, the Mental Health Inventory from the Medical Outcomes Study Survey, and the Perceived Deficits Questionnaire ( Ware et al., 1994 , Hays et al., 1995 ). The clinical measures were compared between the pre- and post-intervention time points using a mixed effects repeated measures ANOVA in SPSS and results are reported for the NAC and control group as well as the group*time interaction. Significant clinical changes in the NAC group were also compared to imaging changes using a Pearson R correlation. To determine neurophysiological changes, resting state BOLD MRI imaging was performed simultaneously with an FDG PET scan on an integrated PET-MRI platform at the pre- and post-intervention time points (see detailed neuroimaging methods below).
Thirty-six subjects were enrolled and twenty-nine completed. There were sixteen completers in the NAC treatment group (7 M:9 F; 12 relapsing remitting and 4 primary progressive; mean duration of illness was 15 ± 9; and mean age was 47 ± 15) and thirteen in the waitlist control group (5 M:8 F; 10 relapsing remitting and 3 primary progressive; mean duration of illness was 12 ± 10; and mean age was 51 ± 10). There were no significant differences in the clinical composition of the two study groups.
NAC Intervention
Subjects were randomized using a permuted block method (using a 1:1 ratio with sealed envelopes for the allocation) either to receive intravenous plus oral NAC or to be placed in the waitlist control condition. We used this dosing regimen based on our prior studies of NAC in neurological conditions including MS ( Monti et al., 2020 , Monti et al., 2025 , Monti et al., 2026 ). This dosing was originally developed in order to provide a more definitive bioavailability since early data suggested that oral only dosing might not be sufficient. For 4 ± 2 months both groups continued their current standard of care management for MS, with the experimental group receiving NAC in both oral and intravenous form during that same time period. NAC was obtained from the Jefferson Pharmacy as Acetadote (Cumberland Pharmaceuticals). Pharmaceutical grade NAC is an intravenous (IV) medication most used for the treatment of acetaminophen overdose. Doses of NAC were prepared for each patient by a trained study nurse. The dose was 50 mg/kg mixed into 200 ml of D5W infused over approximately one hour 1x per week. Subjects additionally took 500 mg NAC tablets 2x per day on the days that they did not receive the IV NAC. This was continued until presenting for the second PET-MRI scan.
MRI Acquisition, Analysis, and Statistics
MRI Acquisition
The pre and post MRI scans were performed simultaneously with the FDG PET acquisition and included an initial high-resolution structural scan (no additional MRI scans were used in this analysis although all subjects had prior clinical MRIs to confirm the diagnosis of MS). A T1 MPRAGE sequence was used to perform this scan. The main purpose of acquiring structural image is to better examine cortical and subcortical volumes. This was followed by a resting state scan to assess functional connectivity in the different regions of the brain. The scans were performed using a Siemens mMR 3 T PET-MRI scanner using a 12 channel head coil. The T1-weighted imaging parameters are as follows: TR= 1600 ms, TE= 2.46 ms. FOV= 252 mm, Voxel size = 0.5 × 0.5 × 1 mm 3 , slice thickness= 1 mm, and number of slices= 176. The Echo Planar Imaging (EPI) sequence parameters used for resting state BOLD scans are: TR= 2000ms, TE= 30ms, FOV= 236 mm, voxel size = 3x3x4 mm 3 , slice thickness= 4 mm, number of slices= 34. The imaging time for the resting state scan was 8 min and the total imaging time lasted about 45 min.
MRI Image Processing and Analysis
To uniquely describe the communication between resting state networks without the influence of noise contaminants, a specialized analysis pipeline is required. This process starts with spatial preprocessing using Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM) (Wellcome Group, UCL) along with CONN toolbox ( Whitfield-Gabrieli and Nieto-Castanon, 2012 ) which is an open source Matlab (Mathworks, Inc.) based cross platform imaging software. The resting state connectivity analysis pipeline includes a standard preprocessing of fMRI data using CONN and compCor strategy, ROI (Region of Interest) mask creation, time series extraction of ROIs, computing connectivity matrices and first and second level analysis. The preprocessing pipeline used in CONN is as follows: a) Realignment: fMRI data are realigned with the primarily aim of removing motion artefact in fMRI time-series. In this step, the first image is selected as reference and the subsequent images are realigned to the first one using series of rigid body spatial transformation. b) slice-timing correction: corrects the differences in image acquisition time between slices. c) outlier detection. d) co-registration: aligns functional data and the structural data in the same space. e) segmentation of structural MRI in grey matter, white matter and CSF: applies tissue probability map to put the structural MRI in to standard template space. f) Normalization: applies forward deformations from the segmentation step to put the functional data in to standard space. g) smoothing: in this step the signal is averaged to reduce the noise, which helps increasing signal to noise ratio (SNR). This process is performed on all the patients’ pre and post NAC. After the pre-processing is complete, a seed based functional connectivity group analysis is performed. This method assists in finding within group differences through selected ROI that are listed below. Regions of interests (ROIs) are defined and extracted using combined FSL Harvard- Oxford and AAL atlases.
In this study ROI-ROI analysis was used, a subset of SBC (Seed Based Connectivity). FC was considered significant in regions that survived correction for multiple comparisons using the False Discovery Rate Method, (P_FDR<0.05) to measure resting state functional connectivity between subjects before and after taking NAC. The connection is defined as the bivariate correlation between BOLD time series of two ROIs. The target ROIs were selected based on the hypothesized brain regions that are most affected in MS.
PET-MRI Acquisition, Analysis, and Statistics
PET Acquisition
All PET-MRI scans were conducted using a Siemens mMR integrated PET/MRI system (Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Malvern, PA) following standard clinical imaging protocols. These scans were performed initially (the Pre scan) and after the NAC or waitlist control period (the Post scan). For the FDG PET component, an intravenous catheter was placed prior to tracer administration. Participants remained in a quiet environment with their eyes open and ears unobstructed during the procedure. Approximately 185 MBq (5 mCi) of FDG was injected intravenously, and imaging commenced 30 min later. PET data were acquired over a 20-minute interval while concurrent MRI provided anatomical localization and attenuation correction. MRI was also performed for functional connectivity analysis (see below). Upon completion, images were reconstructed in transaxial planes using an iterative reconstruction algorithm.
PET Analysis and Statistics
FDG PET images were processed and evaluated using the MIMNeuro analysis platform (MIM Software Inc., Cleveland, OH). The primary analytic metric was regional cerebral glucose metabolism expressed relative to the normative database integrated into the MIMNeuro system. This approach provides a semiquantitative assessment by generating Z scores for each ROI based on comparison with the reference population. All scans were normalized to whole-brain metabolic activity, enabling assessment of metabolic changes between pre- and post-NAC scans as well as comparisons with control participants. Forty ROI-based metabolic measurements, along with clinical endpoints (SF−36, MFIS, MHI, and PDQ), were analyzed using a repeated measures linear mixed-effects (LME) model with correction for multiple comparisons performed using the False Discovery Rate (FDR) approach. The 40 regions were based upon regions that have previously been implicated in MS studies and included the vermis, brain stem, and the left and right caudate, thalamus, insula, cerebellum, and the orbitofrontal, inferior frontal, middle frontal, superior frontal, lateral temporal, medial temporal, inferior temporal, superior temporal, middle temporal, inferior parietal, superior parietal, fusiform, occipital, posterior cingulate, and supramarginal gyrus (SMG).
Proceeding to second-level analysis, as a hypothesis testing step, an independent two sample t -test is performed to assess group differences in connectivity. The resting state analysis were done in two different steps. First we considered a more specific analysis accounting for targeted structures of the brain based on those that were observed to be affected on the PET analysis side in order to investigate the connectivity change in those regions and if there were any mutual regions between PET and resting state BOLD analysis. Second, we ran a more stringent analysis applying FDR correction on larger brain areas to assess for additional connectivity changes in the whole brain.
Results
Clinical Results
There were no significant differences between the NAC and control group in the pre-intervention period evaluation. Also, there were no differences in the control group between the two time points based on the repeated measures ANOVA. However, in response to the NAC intervention, there were several significant changes in clinical scores both within the NAC group and the across group comparison (group*time). Specifically, there were self-reported improvements in pain, fatigue, and cognitive function sub-scores (see Table 1 ). Table 1 Clinical measures are shown that were significantly changed in MS patients in the NAC group, between the pre and post the intervention period. Note that there were no significant differences at the pre-time point between the two groups. Also, there were no significant changes in any measures in the control group. The mean value ± standard deviation are presented in addition to the within group p values based on a mixed effects repeated measures ANOVA. Comparison between time*group for the NAC and control group conditions, when using a mixed effects repeated measures ANOVA, were significant for the values in bold. Test Sub-score Control Group NAC Group Pre Mean Post Mean Pairwise p value Pre Mean Post Mean Pairwise p value Time* Group p value 36-Item Short Form Survey Pain 69.3 ± 21.3 75.7 ± 21.4 0.113 60.2 ± 25.4 69.7 ± 18.8 0.015 0.406 Modified Fatigue Impact Scale Survey Total 38.6 ± 22.2 36.1 ± 13.5 0.302 37.1.3 ± 15.8 32.4 ± 15.3 0.016 0.157 Mental Health Inventory From Medical Outcomes Study Survey Cognitive Function 69.0 ± 18.1 65.7 ± 13.5 0.524 66.9 ± 20.2 73.1 ± 16.1 0.036 0.025 Perceived Deficits Questionnaire Attention/ Concentration 8.8 ± 3.8 9.0 ± 3.0 0.800 7.9 ± 4.3 6.5 ± 3.7 0.010 0.024
Table 1
Clinical measures are shown that were significantly changed in MS patients in the NAC group, between the pre and post the intervention period. Note that there were no significant differences at the pre-time point between the two groups. Also, there were no significant changes in any measures in the control group. The mean value ± standard deviation are presented in addition to the within group p values based on a mixed effects repeated measures ANOVA. Comparison between time*group for the NAC and control group conditions, when using a mixed effects repeated measures ANOVA, were significant for the values in bold.
| Test | Sub-score | Control Group | NAC Group | ||||||
| Pre Mean | Post Mean | Pairwise p value | Pre Mean | Post Mean | Pairwise p value | Time* Group p value | |||
| 36-Item Short Form Survey | Pain | 69.3 ± 21.3 | 75.7 ± 21.4 | 0.113 | 60.2 ± 25.4 | 69.7 ± 18.8 | 0.015 | 0.406 | |
| Modified Fatigue Impact Scale Survey | Total | 38.6 ± 22.2 | 36.1 ± 13.5 | 0.302 | 37.1.3 ± 15.8 | 32.4 ± 15.3 | 0.016 | 0.157 | |
| Mental Health Inventory From Medical Outcomes Study Survey | Cognitive Function | 69.0 ± 18.1 | 65.7 ± 13.5 | 0.524 | 66.9 ± 20.2 | 73.1 ± 16.1 | 0.036 | 0.025 | |
| Perceived Deficits Questionnaire | Attention/ Concentration | 8.8 ± 3.8 | 9.0 ± 3.0 | 0.800 | 7.9 ± 4.3 | 6.5 ± 3.7 | 0.010 | 0.024 |
Functional Connectivity
The ROI based functional connectivity analysis finds regions of the brain correlated with the activity in a seed region. In our study, we compared the group that took NAC to the control group. In resting state analysis, there were a number of brain regions that showed significant connectivity changes between the NAC treatment and control groups as shown in Table 2 . The resting state BOLD analysis found significant changes (FDR corrected for multiple comparisons) in FC particularly with the inferior frontal region, cerebellum, and parts of the temporal and parietal lobes. It should be noted that a number of these areas appeared to be involved in the PET results as well (see Table 3 ). Table 2 Results show functional connectivity differences in the NAC group compared to controls between the pre and post scans. Results are given for the linear mixed effects model comparison with the T statistic and FDR corrected p value for those regions (the correction is based on the 40 regions targeted in the analysis). Structures T Statistic p-FDR L Inferior Frontal — L Cerebellum 3.80 0.039 L Inferior Frontal — L Fusiform −3.88 0.038 L Inferior Frontal — R Cerebellum 4.04 0.036 L Inferior Frontal — R Hippocampus −4.09 0.036 L Inferior Frontal — Vermis 3.74 0.041 L Inferior Parietal — R Inferior Parietal −4.17 0.038 L Inferior Parietal — R Superior Parietal −4.19 0.038 L Inferior Temporal — R Fusiform −4.64 0.036 L Inferior Temporal — R Occipital −3.44 0.046 L Middle Frontal — Brain Stem 3.67 0.043 L Middle Frontal — Vermis 3.48 0.045 L Parietal — L Insula 3.98 0.036 L Parietal — R Insula 4.62 0.032 L Prefrontal Cortex — Vermis 4.23 0.038 L Superior Parietal — R Superior Parietal −3.99 0.037 L Supramarginal Gyrus — Brain Stem 3.91 0.038 R Inferior Frontal — Brain Stem 4.37 0.036 R Inferior Frontal — L Fusiform −3.88 0.037 R Inferior Frontal — L Hippocampus −4.38 0.042 R Inferior Frontal — Vermis 3.87 0.037 R Occipital — L Fusiform −4.26 0.038 R Superior Temporal — R Cerebellum −3.54 0.045 R SMG — L SMG −3.97 0.035 (“-“ reflects reduced connectivity between the two structures in the NAC group compared to controls) Table 3 FDG PET results showing brain regions that had statistically significant changes in patients after receiving NAC (p values are FDR corrected for multiple comparisons). These regions had significantly different changes in metabolism when comparing the NAC to the control group when using a mixed effects repeated measures ANOVA. NAC Group Control Group Mean Pre Mean Post p value Mean Pre Mean Post p value Caudate 1.38 ± 1.57 2.02 ± 1.32 0.015 1.65 ± 1.83 1.55 ± 1.90 0.143 Orbitofrontal Region 1.75 ± 1.31 2.24 ± 1.07 0.010 2.72 ± 1.11 2.83 ± 0.97 0.235 Inferior Frontal Gyrus 0.66 ± 1.05 1.07 ± 1.05 0.017 1.43 ± 0.76 1.34 ± 0.92 0.295 Fusiform Gyrus 0.20 ± 0.86 0.91 ± 1.31 0.016 0.30 ± 1.18 0.02 ± 1.10 0.191 Middle Temporal Gyrus −0.17 ± 0.66 0.68 ± 1.08 0.015 0.19 ± 1.11 0.00 ± 1.06 0.265 Inferior Temporal −0.90 ± 1.31 −0.46 ± 0.97 0.040 −0.96 ± 1.10 −0.87 ± 0.87 0.337
Table 2
Results show functional connectivity differences in the NAC group compared to controls between the pre and post scans. Results are given for the linear mixed effects model comparison with the T statistic and FDR corrected p value for those regions (the correction is based on the 40 regions targeted in the analysis).
(“-“ reflects reduced connectivity between the two structures in the NAC group compared to controls)
| Structures | T Statistic | p-FDR |
| L Inferior Frontal — L Cerebellum | 3.80 | 0.039 |
| L Inferior Frontal — L Fusiform | −3.88 | 0.038 |
| L Inferior Frontal — R Cerebellum | 4.04 | 0.036 |
| L Inferior Frontal — R Hippocampus | −4.09 | 0.036 |
| L Inferior Frontal — Vermis | 3.74 | 0.041 |
| L Inferior Parietal — R Inferior Parietal | −4.17 | 0.038 |
| L Inferior Parietal — R Superior Parietal | −4.19 | 0.038 |
| L Inferior Temporal — R Fusiform | −4.64 | 0.036 |
| L Inferior Temporal — R Occipital | −3.44 | 0.046 |
| L Middle Frontal — Brain Stem | 3.67 | 0.043 |
| L Middle Frontal — Vermis | 3.48 | 0.045 |
| L Parietal — L Insula | 3.98 | 0.036 |
| L Parietal — R Insula | 4.62 | 0.032 |
| L Prefrontal Cortex — Vermis | 4.23 | 0.038 |
| L Superior Parietal — R Superior Parietal | −3.99 | 0.037 |
| L Supramarginal Gyrus — Brain Stem | 3.91 | 0.038 |
| R Inferior Frontal — Brain Stem | 4.37 | 0.036 |
| R Inferior Frontal — L Fusiform | −3.88 | 0.037 |
| R Inferior Frontal — L Hippocampus | −4.38 | 0.042 |
| R Inferior Frontal — Vermis | 3.87 | 0.037 |
| R Occipital — L Fusiform | −4.26 | 0.038 |
| R Superior Temporal — R Cerebellum | −3.54 | 0.045 |
| R SMG — L SMG | −3.97 | 0.035 |
Table 3
FDG PET results showing brain regions that had statistically significant changes in patients after receiving NAC (p values are FDR corrected for multiple comparisons). These regions had significantly different changes in metabolism when comparing the NAC to the control group when using a mixed effects repeated measures ANOVA.
| NAC Group | Control Group | |||||||
| Mean Pre | Mean Post | p value | Mean Pre | Mean Post | p value | |||
| Caudate | 1.38 ± 1.57 | 2.02 ± 1.32 | 0.015 | 1.65 ± 1.83 | 1.55 ± 1.90 | 0.143 | ||
| Orbitofrontal Region | 1.75 ± 1.31 | 2.24 ± 1.07 | 0.010 | 2.72 ± 1.11 | 2.83 ± 0.97 | 0.235 | ||
| Inferior Frontal Gyrus | 0.66 ± 1.05 | 1.07 ± 1.05 | 0.017 | 1.43 ± 0.76 | 1.34 ± 0.92 | 0.295 | ||
| Fusiform Gyrus | 0.20 ± 0.86 | 0.91 ± 1.31 | 0.016 | 0.30 ± 1.18 | 0.02 ± 1.10 | 0.191 | ||
| Middle Temporal Gyrus | −0.17 ± 0.66 | 0.68 ± 1.08 | 0.015 | 0.19 ± 1.11 | 0.00 ± 1.06 | 0.265 | ||
| Inferior Temporal | −0.90 ± 1.31 | −0.46 ± 0.97 | 0.040 | −0.96 ± 1.10 | −0.87 ± 0.87 | 0.337 |
Assessing clinical score changes in patients post NAC treatment, there were several correlations found with resting state fMRI connectivity results. Specifically, there was a significant correlations between the change in FC between the right cerebellum and left inferior frontal region with the change in attention/concentration (Pearson R = 0.42, p = 0.028) as well as the change in FC between the left parietal lobe and left insula with the change in total fatigue (Pearson R = 0.41, p = 0.030).
FDG PET Cerebral Glucose Metabolism
The FDG PET analysis revealed a number of brain regions that were significantly affected by the NAC intervention (FDR corrected for multiple comparisons; see Table 3 ). Specifically, there were significant increases in metabolism in the caudate, orbitofrontal region, inferior frontal gyrus, fusiform gyrus, middle temporal gyrus, and inferior temporal gyrus (see Table 3 ). There were no significant changes observed in the control group.
Finally, we compared correlations between changes in cerebral glucose metabolism measured with FDG PET to the changes in clinical measures and found several significant correlations. These are presented in Table 4 . Table 4 Changes in cerebral glucose metabolism that correlated with changes in the self-reported clinical measures (Pearson R). Structures – Clinical Measure Pearson R p-value Amygdala – Total Fatigue 0.56 0.024 Thalamus – Attention/Concentration 0.57 0.022 Cerebellum – Attention/Concentration −0.83 > 0.001 Superior Temporal – Attention/Concentration −0.53 0.037 Fusiform – Attention/Concentration −0.51 0.041 Inferior Frontal – Pain 0.80 > 0.001 Inferior Temporal – Pain 0.76 > 0.001 Orbitofrontal – Pain 0.69 0.003 Fusiform – Pain 0.73 0.001 Middle Temporal – Pain 0.72 0.002
Table 4
Changes in cerebral glucose metabolism that correlated with changes in the self-reported clinical measures (Pearson R).
| Structures – Clinical Measure | Pearson R | p-value |
| Amygdala – Total Fatigue | 0.56 | 0.024 |
| Thalamus – Attention/Concentration | 0.57 | 0.022 |
| Cerebellum – Attention/Concentration | −0.83 | > 0.001 |
| Superior Temporal – Attention/Concentration | −0.53 | 0.037 |
| Fusiform – Attention/Concentration | −0.51 | 0.041 |
| Inferior Frontal – Pain | 0.80 | > 0.001 |
| Inferior Temporal – Pain | 0.76 | > 0.001 |
| Orbitofrontal – Pain | 0.69 | 0.003 |
| Fusiform – Pain | 0.73 | 0.001 |
| Middle Temporal – Pain | 0.72 | 0.002 |
Discussion
To our knowledge, this is the first study that evaluated a treatment response to NAC in patients with MS, using the combination of PET and MRI technologies. The results suggest that there were several brain regions that underwent significant changes in their FC and glucose metabolism in response to the NAC. These functional brain assessments combined with clinical data provide new information on the neurophysiology of MS and potential effects of NAC as a treatment.
In the present study, the experimental group showed that some brain regions had decreased FC in response to treatment and some areas had increased FC, suggesting NAC may enhance FC in areas in which it is impaired, and improve FC in areas in which it is abnormally heightened. This is consistent with what is known about the balance between inhibitory and excitatory processes, both of which can be affected by the lesions of MS ( Stampanoni Bassi et al., 2017 ; Logothetis, 2002 ). In general, excitatory glutamate-mediated synaptic activity generates local field potentials that drive metabolic demand and cerebral blood flow, whereas inhibitory GABAergic interneurons affect the timing, synchronization, and gain of neuronal firing across distributed networks ( Lauritzen et al., 2012 ). Consequently, functional connectivity is increasingly viewed as a macroscopic manifestation of the dynamic balance between excitation and inhibition (E/I balance), rather than simply reflecting overall neuronal firing rates ( Xu, 2015 ). Disruption of this balance alters the temporal coherence of neuronal oscillations and is believed to underlie the abnormal network connectivity observed in numerous neurological disorders such as MS ( Gao et al., 2018 , Zhang et al., 2024 ).
Recent multimodal imaging studies combining proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H-MRS) with fMRI have further demonstrated that regional concentrations of glutamate and GABA are associated with both resting-state and task-related BOLD activity. Higher cortical GABA concentrations are generally associated with reduced local BOLD responses and decreased functional connectivity, whereas greater glutamatergic activity is often associated with stronger activation and enhanced communication across distributed brain networks ( Duncan et al., 2014 ). These observations support the concept that functional connectivity reflects the integrated effects of excitatory and inhibitory neurotransmission on large-scale neuronal networks. Because disorders such as multiple sclerosis are associated with disturbances in glutamatergic signaling, GABAergic inhibition, oxidative stress, and mitochondrial dysfunction, resting-state functional connectivity may be an important biomarker of neuronal network integrity and neuroplasticity that complements metabolic findings from FDG PET.
Key areas of the brain with altered FC such as the fusiform gyrus, middle temporal gyrus, and inferior frontal regions also had increased metabolic activity observed on FDG PET. Thus, the findings of both altered FC and increased glucose metabolism in the temporal lobe and inferior frontal region along with noted improvements in cognitive processing and attention, cumulatively suggest a potential specific effect of NAC treatment that is encouraging and warrants further investigation. Impaired cognition is a significant problem among patients with MS with between 40% and 70% of patients affected ( Chiaravalloti and DeLuca, 2008 , Lovera and Kovner, 2012 , Benedict et al., 2020 ). Memory, information processing speed, and attention and executive function, also are commonly affected in MS patients ( Miller et al., 2018 ), significantly impacting quality of life ( Hoogs et al., 2011 , Gómez-Melero et al., 2024 ).
There is one study in which FDG PET data has been used to evaluate a therapeutic response in MS patients. However, this study focused on white matter glucose metabolism in 33 patients with MS and evaluated changes related to several different therapies. It reported a mixed response and no clear difference between treatment arms, but this might have been due to the limited sample size.
The current study specifically explored changes in cortical glucose metabolism since some studies have found that severity of MS is associated with worse cortical glucose metabolism ( Blinkenberg et al., 1999 , Mathur et al., 2014 ). Thus, the increased metabolic activity observed in response to NAC may suggest improvement in brain function.
This study utilized intravenous NAC as the primary intervention, supplemented by oral, based on the limited available data. Oral absorption is variable, which is likely the reason that infusions alone or the combination of infusions plus oral has been the most used in neurological studies. For example, one MRS study showed an increase in brain glutathione levels in patients receiving an intravenous dose of NAC ( Tommasin et al., 2019 ), but another MRS study using only oral NAC revealed no increase in brain glutathione ( Coles et al., 2017 ).
There are several important limitations to the current study. Although we included a control group, it was not a placebo group and this was not a blinded study. It is possible that the improvements that we observed in the NAC group could have been influenced by a placebo effect. In addition, a more likely effect given the lack of blinding is that patients may have answered the self report clinical measures in a manner more suggestive of a beneficial effect in patients who knew that they were receiving NAC. However, given the ethical concerns raised regarding giving MS patients a placebo for weekly IV infusions ( Polman et al., 2008 ), we opted to have a waitlist control for this initial study. The treatment was offered without charge after the experimental period. Future studies would be strengthened by formal neuropsychological testing. To better elucidate possible mechanisms of treatment effect, it also may be helpful in future studies to measure NAC or glutathione levels in the brain either through direct measurement of CSF or through an approach such as MR spectroscopy. We also anticipate that future studies can utilize more advanced MRI sequences with longer acquisitions to improve reliability of the data on FC parameters. Another limitation was the method for evaluating the FDG PET scans. While we used a commercially available FDA approved software system, it could still only evaluate relative effects in brain regions which are normalized against the whole brain metabolism. Unfortunately, the only way to truly evaluate whole brain metabolic changes (or large brain areas that might be affected in MS), as well as regional changes, would be to perform arterial sampling to obtain absolute quantification of glucose metabolism. This requires a much more complex approach to imaging the patient that typically includes arterial sampling. While larger areas may be affected in MS, due to the additional heterogeneity of the disease, it may be difficult to find statistically significant results in general. However, it is noteworthy that there were a select group of specific regions found to be involved in the metabolic response to NAC. Another important question is that although this study provided patients with both intravenous and NAC, it is not known whether this combination is required to produce clinical or physiological effects in MS, and what would be the ideal treatment length. Finally, clinical results are based on self-reported questionnaires.
In summary, this is the first study to use PET-MRI to evaluate the effects of NAC administration in patients with MS. The data suggests a potential role for FC and cerebral glucose metabolism to help characterize disease characteristics and elucidate the clinical effects of MS treatment. Importantly, the current study provides encouraging initial data that NAC might positively impact resting FC and cerebral glucose metabolism in MS patients, and this appears to be associated with improved symptoms, particularly related to cognition and attention. The next level of inquiry with a larger randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled efficacy trial is warranted.
Ethics approval and Consent to participate
The study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Institutional Review Board at Thomas Jefferson University.
Authors’ Conflict of Interest
No authors have any financial conflict of interest related to the study.
Consent for Publication
Not applicable.
Trial Registration
Registered on clinicaltrials.gov 01/26/2017, NCT03032601
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Nancy Wintering: Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Project administration, Methodology, Investigation, Conceptualization. Monisha Gupta: Writing – review & editing, Project administration, Investigation. Mahdi Alizadeh: Writing – review & editing, Methodology, Formal analysis. George Zabrecky: Writing – review & editing, Methodology, Funding acquisition, Conceptualization. Sahar Darabi Monadi: Writing – original draft, Methodology, Formal analysis, Data curation. Mohamed Feroze B: Writing – original draft, Resources, Methodology, Conceptualization. Newberg Andrew B: Writing – original draft, Supervision, Project administration, Methodology, Investigation, Formal analysis, Conceptualization. Monti Daniel: Writing – original draft, Supervision, Project administration, Methodology, Investigation, Funding acquisition, Formal analysis, Conceptualization. Daniel Kremens: Writing – review & editing, Methodology, Conceptualization. Alicia Steinmetz: Writing – review & editing, Project administration, Investigation. Bazzan Anthony: Writing – review & editing, Methodology, Conceptualization.
Declaration of Competing Interest
None of the authors have any conflicts of interest nor competing interests to report. This paper is our original work. We certify that all authors named deserve authorship, and that all authors have agreed to be so listed and have read and approved the manuscript.
References
Bakshi R. Miletich R.S. Kinkel P.R. High-resolution fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography shows both global and regional cerebral hypometabolism in multiple sclerosis J. Neuroimag 8 4 1998 228 234 10.1111/jon199884228 9780855
Benedict R.H.B. Amato M.P. DeLuca J. Geurts J.J.G. Cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis: clinical management, MRI, and therapeutic avenues Lancet Neurol. 19 10 2020 860 871 10.1016/S1474-4422(20)30277-5 32949546 PMC10011205
Blinkenberg M. Jensen C.V. Holm S. Paulson O.B. Sørensen P.S. A longitudinal study of cerebral glucose metabolism, MRI, and disability in patients with MS Neurology 53 1 1999 149 153 10.1212/wnl.53.1.149 10408551
Bonavita S. Gallo A. Sacco R. Distributed changes in default-mode resting-state connectivity in multiple sclerosis Mult. Scler. 17 4 2011 411 422 10.1177/1352458510394609 21239414
Chiaravalloti N.D. DeLuca J. Cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis Lancet Neurol. 2008 7 2008 1139 1151 10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70259-X 19007738
Coles L.D. Tuite P.J. Öz G. Repeated-dose oral N-Acetylcysteine in Multiple sclerosis: Pharmacokinetics and effect on brain glutathione and oxidative stress J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2017 10.1002/jcph.1008 PMC5762253 28940353
Derache N. Marié R.M. Constans J.M. Defer G.L. Reduced thalamic and cerebellar rest metabolism in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, a positron emission tomography study: correlations to lesion load J. Neurol. Sci. 245 1-2 2006 103 109 10.1016/j.jns.2005.09.017 16647086
Dogonowski A.M. Blinkenberg M. Paulson O.B. Recovery from an acute relapse is associated with changes in motor resting-state connectivity in multiple sclerosis Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatr. 87 2016 912 914 10.1136/jnnp-2015-311375 PMC4975821 26668202
Dringen R. Hirrlinger J. Glutathione pathways in the brain Biol. Chem. 384 2003 505 516 10.1515/BC.2003.059 12751781
Duncan N.W. Wiebking C. Northoff G. Associations of regional GABA and glutamate with intrinsic and extrinsic neural activity in humans—a review of multimodal imaging studies Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 47 2014 36 52 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.07.016 25066091
Faivre A. Robinet E. Guye M. Depletion of brain functional connectivity enhancement leads to disability progression in multiple sclerosis: A longitudinal resting-state fMRI study Mult. Scler. 22 2016 1695 1708 10.1177/1352458516628657 26838014
Gao F. Yin X. Edden R.A.E. Altered hippocampal GABA and glutamate levels and uncoupling from functional connectivity in multiple sclerosis Hippocampus 28 11 2018 813 823 10.1002/hipo.23001 30069963 PMC6251738
Goldenberg M.M. Multiple sclerosis review Pharm. Ther. 37 3 2012 175 184 PMC3351877 22605909
Gómez-Melero S. Caballero-Villarraso J. Escribano B.M. Impact of cognitive impairment on quality of life in multiple sclerosis patients: A comprehensive review J. Clin. Med. 13 11 2024 3321 10.3390/jcm13113321 38893032 PMC11172944
Hays R.D. Sherbourne C.D. Mazel R. User's Manual for the Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Core Measures of Health-Related Quality of Life 1995 Rand Corporation
Holmay M.J. Terpstra M. Coles L.D. N-Acetylcysteine boosts brain and blood glutathione in Gaucher and Parkinson diseases Clin. Neuropharmacol. 36 4 2013 103 106 10.1097/WNF.0b013e31829ae713 23860343 PMC3934795
Hoogs M. Kaur S. Smerbeck A. Weinstock-Guttman B. Benedict R.H. Cognition and physical disability in predicting health-related quality of life in multiple sclerosis Inter. J. MS Care 13 2 2011 57 63 10.7224/1537-2073-13.2.57 PMC3882954 24453706
Ibitoye R. Kemp K.C. Rice C.M. Hares K.M. Scolding N.J. Wilkins A. Oxidative stress-related biomarkers in multiple sclerosis: a review Biomark. Med. 10 2016 889 902 10.2217/bmm-2016-0097 27416337
Khalatbari Mohseni G. Hosseini S.A. Majdinasab N. Cheraghian B. Effects of N-acetylcysteine on oxidative stress biomarkers, depression, and anxiety symptoms in patients with multiple sclerosis Neuropsychopharmacol. Rep. 43 3 2023 382 390 10.1002/npr2.12360 37386885 PMC10496087
Kingwell K. Neuronal network connectivity is altered in multiple sclerosis Nat. Rev. Neurol. 8 2012 593 10.1038/nrneurol.2012.205 23045234
Kreisl W.C. Kim M.J. Coughlin J.M. Henter I.D. Owen D.R. Innis R.B. PET imaging of neuroinflammation in neurological disorders Lancet Neurol. 19 11 2020 940 950 10.1016/S1474-4422(20)30346-X 33098803 PMC7912433
Krysko K. Bischof A. Nourbakhsh B. N-acetyl cysteine for fatigue in progressive multiple sclerosis: A pilot randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial (P5.2-093) Neurology 92 15_ement 2019 P5.2-093 10.1212/WNL.92.15_supplement.P5.2-093
Lauritzen M. Mathiesen C. Schaefer K. Thomsen K.J. Neuronal inhibition and excitation, and the dichotomic control of brain hemodynamic and oxygen responses NeuroImage 62 2 2012 1040 1050 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.040 22261372
Logothetis N.K. The neural basis of the blood-oxygen-level-dependent functional magnetic resonance imaging signal Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 357 1424 2002 1003 1037 10.1098/rstb.2002.1114 12217171 PMC1693017
Lovera J. Kovner B. Cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis Curr. Neurol. Neurosci. Rep. 12 2012 618 627 10.1007/s11910-012-0294-3 22791241 PMC4581520
Martínez-Banaclocha M. Hernández A.I. Martínez N. N-acetylcysteine protects against age-related increase in oxidized proteins in mouse synaptic mitochondria Brain Res. 762 1997 256 258 9262186 10.1016/s0006-8993(97)00493-9
Martínez-Banaclocha M. Martínez N. Hernández A.I. Ferrándiz M.L. Hypothesis: can N-acetylcysteine be beneficial in Parkinson’s disease? Life Sci. 64 1999 1253 1257 10.1016/s0024-3205(98)00472-x 10227580
Mathur D. López-Rodas G. Casanova B. Marti M.B. Perturbed glucose metabolism: insights into multiple sclerosis pathogenesis Front. Neurol. 5 2014 250 10.3389/fneur.2014.00250 25520698 PMC4249254
Miller E. Morel A. Redlicka J. Miller I. Saluk J. Pharmacological and non-pharmacological therapies of cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis Curr. Neuropharmacol. 16 2018 475 483 10.2174/1570159X15666171109132650 29119933 PMC6018194
Monti D.A. Faezeh V. Zabrecky G. Changes in resting-state functional connectivity and cognitive-affective symptoms in patients with post-concussion syndrome treated with N-Acetyl Cysteine J. Head. Trauma. Rehab. 40 3 2025 E196 E207 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000976 39531327
Monti D.A. Zabrecky G. Kremens D. N-Acetylcysteine is associated with changes in functional connectivity in patients with Parkinson's disease Park. Rel. Dis. 144 2026 108216 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2026.108216 41619526
Monti D.A. Zabrecky G. Leist T.P. N-acetyl cysteine administration is associated with increased cerebral glucose metabolism in patients with multiple sclerosis: An exploratory study Front. Neurol. 11 2020 88 10.3389/fneur.2020.00088 32117038 PMC7033492
Narapureddy B. Dubey D. Clinical evaluation of dimethyl fumarate for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: efficacy, safety, patient experience and adherence Patient Prefer. Adherence 13 2019 1655 1666 10.2147/PPA.S187529 31631980 PMC6778444
Petsas N. De Giglio L. González-Quintanilla V. Giuliani M. De Angelis F. Tona F. Carmellini M. Mainero C. Pozzilli C. Pantano P. Functional Connectivity Changes After Initial Treatment With Fingolimod in Multiple Sclerosis Front. Neurol. 10 2019 153 10.3389/fneur.2019.00153 30967828 PMC6438876
Polman C.H. Reingold S.C. Barkhof F. Ethics of placebo-controlled clinical trials in multiple sclerosis: a reassessment Neurology 70 13 Pt 2 2008 1134 1140 10.1212/01.wnl.0000306410.84794.4d 18362273
Qu B. Li S. Chen H. Zhang Y. Lui S. Lv P. Yao L. Disrupted and reorganized connectivity of brain networks in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of resting-state functional MRI J. Neurol. 273 2 2026 139 10.1007/s00415-026-13665-9 41670734
Rocca M.A. Schoonheim M.M. Valsasina P. Geurts J.J.G. Filippi M. Task- and resting-state fMRI studies in multiple sclerosis: From regions to systems and time-varying analysis. Current status and future perspective NeuroImage Clin. 35 2022 103076 10.1016/j.nicl.2022.103076 PMC9194954 35691253
Rocca M.A. Valsasina P. Leavitt V.M. Functional network connectivity abnormalities in multiple sclerosis: Correlations with disability and cognitive impairment Mult. Scler. 24 4 2018 459 471 10.1177/1352458517699875 28294693
Roelcke U. Kappos L. Lechner-Scott J. Reduced glucose metabolism in the frontal cortex and basal ganglia of multiple sclerosis patients with fatigue: a 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography study Neurology 48 6 1997 1566 1571 10.1212/wnl.48.6.1566 9191767
Sies H. Cadenas E. Oxidative stress: damage to intact cells and organs Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 311 1985 617 631 2869521 10.1098/rstb.1985.0168
Stampanoni Bassi M. Mori F. Buttari F. Neurophysiology of synaptic functioning in multiple sclerosis Clin. Neurophysiol. 128 7 2017 1148 1157 10.1016/j.clinph.2017.04.006 28511127
Tahedl M. Levine S.M. Greenlee M.W. Weissert R. Schwarzbach J.V. Functional connectivity in multiple sclerosis: recent findings and future directions Front. Neurol. 9 2018 828 10.3389/fneur.2018.00828 30364281 PMC6193088
Tommasin S. Giannì C. De Giglio L. Pantano P. Neuroimaging Techniques to Assess Inflammation in Multiple Sclerosis 2019 Apr 1 Neuroscience 403 2019 4 16 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2017.07.055 28764938
Vina J. Romero F.J. Saez G.T. Pallardó F.V. Effects of cysteine and N-acetyl cysteine on GSH content of brain of adult rats Experientia 39 1983 164 165 10.1007/bf01958877 6832291
Ware J.E. Kosinski M. Keller S.D. SF-36 Physical and Mental Health Summary Scales: A Users' Manual 1994 The Health Institute Boston
Whitfield-Gabrieli S. Nieto-Castanon A. Conn: A functional connectivity toolbox for correlated and anticorrelated brain networks Brain Connect. 2 2012 125 141 10.1089/brain.2012.0073 22642651
Xu J. Implications of cortical balanced excitation and inhibition, functional heterogeneity, and sparseness of neuronal activity in fMRI Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 57 2015 264 270 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.08.018 26341939 PMC4623927
Xu Z. Zhang F. Sun F. Gu K. Dong S. He D. Dimethyl fumarate for multiple sclerosis Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2015 4 2015 CD011076 10.1002/14651858.CD011076.pub2 PMC10663978 25900414
Yadav S.K. Soin D. Ito K. Dhib-Jalbut S. Insight into the mechanism of action of dimethyl fumarate in multiple sclerosis J. Mol. Med. 97 4 2019 463 472 10.1007/s00109-019-01761-5 30820593
Zhang C. Zhang K. Hu X. Regional GABA levels modulate abnormal resting-state network functional connectivity and cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis Cereb. Cortex 34 2 2024 bhad535 10.1093/cercor/bhad535 38271282
Data availability statement
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Acknowledgments
This project was supported by a grant from the Coors Foundation.