Journal of pediatric and adolescent gynecology · 2026
Adolescent Experiences with Procedural Sedation for Intrauterine Device Placement: A Pilot Study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bryant Ellen, Stancil Stephani, Priebe Anne-Marie, Nos Andrea, Lawson Ashli
Аннотация
PURPOSE: This study examines adolescent experiences with intrauterine device (IUD) insertion under conscious sedation.
METHODS: We conducted a prospective pilot study of 11-21-year-olds who chose conscious sedation for their IUD insertion. Participants completed pre-procedure surveys (e.g., demographics, anticipated pain, reproductive history) and post-procedure surveys (e.g., pain during insertion and overall experience). Providers completed a survey on the day of IUD insertion with sedation type, complications, and reason for sedation.
RESULTS: In 16 youth (16.1 ± 1.8 years), 14 received moderate sedation (intravenous midazolam and fentanyl) and 2 received light sedation (nitrous oxide). The most reported "worst part" was procedural cramps (n=5, 31%). The "best part" was sedation effects (n=7, 44%). All patients who received light sedation remembered the insertion compared to 2 of 14 (14%) patients who received moderate sedation. Patients reported an average satisfaction score of 83 on a 100-point visual analogue scale, with no difference between sedation types.
DISCUSSION: Adolescents were highly satisfied with procedural sedation for IUD insertion. Fewer participants remembered the procedure when they received moderate compared to light sedation.
IMPLICATIONS AND CONTRIBUTIONS: IUDs are effective as reversible contraception and menstrual management. The pelvic exam and pain may discourage use of the IUD, but sedation offers an alternate experience. Examining patient experiences will help clinicians counsel future patients on their anticipated experience and provides evidence-based rationale for modification and expansion of this service.
METHODS: We conducted a prospective pilot study of 11-21-year-olds who chose conscious sedation for their IUD insertion. Participants completed pre-procedure surveys (e.g., demographics, anticipated pain, reproductive history) and post-procedure surveys (e.g., pain during insertion and overall experience). Providers completed a survey on the day of IUD insertion with sedation type, complications, and reason for sedation.
RESULTS: In 16 youth (16.1 ± 1.8 years), 14 received moderate sedation (intravenous midazolam and fentanyl) and 2 received light sedation (nitrous oxide). The most reported "worst part" was procedural cramps (n=5, 31%). The "best part" was sedation effects (n=7, 44%). All patients who received light sedation remembered the insertion compared to 2 of 14 (14%) patients who received moderate sedation. Patients reported an average satisfaction score of 83 on a 100-point visual analogue scale, with no difference between sedation types.
DISCUSSION: Adolescents were highly satisfied with procedural sedation for IUD insertion. Fewer participants remembered the procedure when they received moderate compared to light sedation.
IMPLICATIONS AND CONTRIBUTIONS: IUDs are effective as reversible contraception and menstrual management. The pelvic exam and pain may discourage use of the IUD, but sedation offers an alternate experience. Examining patient experiences will help clinicians counsel future patients on their anticipated experience and provides evidence-based rationale for modification and expansion of this service.