MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3109/02688697.2014.920485

Медицинская библиотека · British journal of neurosurgery · 2014

Histologic confirmation of neuronal cell bodies along the spinal accessory nerve.

Tubbs R Shane, Sorenson Edward P, Watanabe Koichi, Loukas Marios, Hattab Eyas, Cohen-Gadol Aaron A

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

Most sources conclude that the spinal accessory nerve (SAN) is a purely motor nerve. There are some reports that suggest a sensory component, although the exact nature of such sensory fibers has yet to be elucidated. With such discrepancies in the literature and with well-established pain syndromes of unknown etiology following SAN injury, the authors performed the present study to better clarify this anatomy.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

The entire accessory nerve was harvested from 10 adult cadavers. Samples were then submitted for immunohistochemical analyses.

RESULTS

Occasional microganglia cells were identified along the SAN in all specimens. These ganglia were most numerous along the intracranial segment of the SAN, but none was found along the cranial rootlets of the accessory nerve.

CONCLUSIONS

Neuronal cell bodies were identified along the course of the SAN in human cadavers. Although the function is not certain, such cells have been found in other animals to be nocioceptive in nature. Pending further study, these cells may be found to be involved in enigmatic pain syndromes thought to arise in the sternocleidomastoid and trapezius muscles.

Для цитирования: Tubbs R Shane, Sorenson Edward P, Watanabe Koichi, Loukas Marios, Hattab Eyas, Cohen-Gadol Aaron A. Histologic confirmation of neuronal cell bodies along the spinal accessory nerve.. British journal of neurosurgery. 2014. DOI: 10.3109/02688697.2014.920485.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.