International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2022
Continuous versus disrupted subcutaneous tissue closure in cesarean section: A retrospective cohort study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lauterbach Roy, Ben David Chen, Bachar Gal, Justman Naphtali, Matanes Emad, Ginsberg Yuval, Vitner Dana, Beloosesky Ron, Weiner Zeev, Zipori Yaniv
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To compare rates of surgical-site infections following continuous, as compared with interrupted, subcutaneous tissue closure technique during cesarean delivery (CD).
METHODS: A retrospective cohort study during 2008-2018. The study group included women who underwent either elective or emergent CD with continuous subcutaneous tissue closure, while the control group comprised those with interrupted subcutaneous tissue closure. We excluded women with suspected infectious morbidity before CD. The primary outcome was surgical-site infection (SSI) rate.
RESULTS: The final analysis included 6281 women. We performed continuous subcutaneous tissue closure in 37.4% (1867/4988) of scheduled CD, and 45.8% (592/1293) of emergent CD. The rate of SSI was significantly lower following continuous than interrupted subcutaneous tissue closure, in both elective CD (2.7% versus 4.5%, respectively, P = 0.031) and emergent CD (3.2% versus 5.4%, respectively, P = 0.036) in nulliparous and multiparous women. Similarly, secondary outcomes such as re-admission rates, postoperative maternal fever, and need for antibiotic treatment were significantly lower following continuous subcutaneous closure.
CONCLUSIONS: Continuous subcutaneous closure technique during CD yields a lower rate of surgical-site complications compared with the interrupted technique.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort study during 2008-2018. The study group included women who underwent either elective or emergent CD with continuous subcutaneous tissue closure, while the control group comprised those with interrupted subcutaneous tissue closure. We excluded women with suspected infectious morbidity before CD. The primary outcome was surgical-site infection (SSI) rate.
RESULTS: The final analysis included 6281 women. We performed continuous subcutaneous tissue closure in 37.4% (1867/4988) of scheduled CD, and 45.8% (592/1293) of emergent CD. The rate of SSI was significantly lower following continuous than interrupted subcutaneous tissue closure, in both elective CD (2.7% versus 4.5%, respectively, P = 0.031) and emergent CD (3.2% versus 5.4%, respectively, P = 0.036) in nulliparous and multiparous women. Similarly, secondary outcomes such as re-admission rates, postoperative maternal fever, and need for antibiotic treatment were significantly lower following continuous subcutaneous closure.
CONCLUSIONS: Continuous subcutaneous closure technique during CD yields a lower rate of surgical-site complications compared with the interrupted technique.