MedElevator
Войти в исследования Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2020
Neonatal abstinence syndrome management in California birth hospitals: results of a statewide survey.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Clemans-Cope Lisa, Holla Nikhil, Lee Henry C, Cong Allison Shufei, Castro Robert, Chyi Lisa, Huang Angela, Taylor Kimá Joy, Kenney Genevieve M
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Assess management of neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) in California hospitals to identify potential opportunities to expand the use of best practices.
STUDY DESIGN: We fielded an internet-based survey of 37 questions to medical directors or nurse managers at 145 birth hospitals in California.
RESULTS: Seventy-five participants (52%) responded. Most respondents reported having at least one written protocol for managing NAS, but gaps included protocols for pharmacologic management. Newer tools for assessing NAS severity were not commonly used. About half reported usually or always using nonpharmacologic strategies; there is scope for increasing breastfeeding when recommended, skin-to-skin care, and rooming-in.
CONCLUSIONS: We found systematic gaps in care for infants with NAS in a sample of California birth hospitals, as well as opportunities to spread best practices. Adoption of new approaches will vary across hospitals. A concerted statewide effort to facilitate such implementation has strong potential to increase access to evidence-based treatment for infants and mothers.
STUDY DESIGN: We fielded an internet-based survey of 37 questions to medical directors or nurse managers at 145 birth hospitals in California.
RESULTS: Seventy-five participants (52%) responded. Most respondents reported having at least one written protocol for managing NAS, but gaps included protocols for pharmacologic management. Newer tools for assessing NAS severity were not commonly used. About half reported usually or always using nonpharmacologic strategies; there is scope for increasing breastfeeding when recommended, skin-to-skin care, and rooming-in.
CONCLUSIONS: We found systematic gaps in care for infants with NAS in a sample of California birth hospitals, as well as opportunities to spread best practices. Adoption of new approaches will vary across hospitals. A concerted statewide effort to facilitate such implementation has strong potential to increase access to evidence-based treatment for infants and mothers.