Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992) · 2026
Both Restricted and Excessive Foetal Growth Increase the Odds of Failing Early Language Screening: A Register Study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Fäldt Anna, Liljekvist Isabelle, Dahlberg Anton
Аннотация
AIM: To investigate whether birth size for gestational age is associated with failure at language screening in early childhood.
METHODS: This population-based cohort study used linked national register data from Sweden. Children born between 2018 and 2023 who had undergone language screening at 2 years 4 months to 3 years 3 months of age were included (n = 194 637; 94 051 females, 100 586 males). Logistic regression estimated associations between birth size for gestational age and screening failure, with children born appropriate for gestational age as the reference group, adjusting for sex, preterm birth, parental education, maternal smoking, and parental country of birth.
RESULTS: Overall, 12% of children failed the language screening. Children born small for gestational age had higher odds of failure than appropriate for gestational age children (adjusted OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.30-1.54), as did children born large for gestational age (adjusted OR 1.24, 95% CI 1.15-1.33). Male sex, preterm birth, lower parental education, maternal smoking, and having two foreign-born parents were each associated with screening failure.
CONCLUSIONS: Both restricted and excessive foetal growth were associated with increased likelihood of failing language screening, suggesting that deviations from typical foetal growth patterns may affect language development.
METHODS: This population-based cohort study used linked national register data from Sweden. Children born between 2018 and 2023 who had undergone language screening at 2 years 4 months to 3 years 3 months of age were included (n = 194 637; 94 051 females, 100 586 males). Logistic regression estimated associations between birth size for gestational age and screening failure, with children born appropriate for gestational age as the reference group, adjusting for sex, preterm birth, parental education, maternal smoking, and parental country of birth.
RESULTS: Overall, 12% of children failed the language screening. Children born small for gestational age had higher odds of failure than appropriate for gestational age children (adjusted OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.30-1.54), as did children born large for gestational age (adjusted OR 1.24, 95% CI 1.15-1.33). Male sex, preterm birth, lower parental education, maternal smoking, and having two foreign-born parents were each associated with screening failure.
CONCLUSIONS: Both restricted and excessive foetal growth were associated with increased likelihood of failing language screening, suggesting that deviations from typical foetal growth patterns may affect language development.