MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1046/j.1442-2042.2002.00529.x

Медицинская библиотека · International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association · 2002

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy treatment in paraplegic patients with bladder stones.

Kilciler Mete, Sümer Fahri, Bedir Selahattin, Ozgök Yaşar, Erduran Dogan

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Spinal cord injury patients are at increased risk of developing urolithiasis and many will require treatment, most commonly with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL).

METHODS

We examined 20 consecutive spinal cord injury patients (all male) undergoing ESWL for the treatment of bladder stones between April 1992 and May 2000. The mean number of shock waves administered in these 20 patients was 3600 and the shock power was 19 kW/s. All patients were treated without anesthesia. After ESWL, the bladder was irrigated with povidone iodine solution and stone fragments were evacuated through a 22F endoscopic sheath.

RESULTS

All patients became stone-free after ESWL. Stone fragments were observed in the urethra of 3 patients, which were removed by urethroscopy. No major complication was observed; however, 5 patients had minor hematuria (which subsided within 24 h) and subfebrile fever (37.2-37.5 degrees C).

CONCLUSION

ESWL and transurethral bladder irrigation is a safe, effective and simple modality for the treatment of bladder stones in spinal cord injury patients.

Для цитирования: Kilciler Mete, Sümer Fahri, Bedir Selahattin, Ozgök Yaşar, Erduran Dogan. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy treatment in paraplegic patients with bladder stones.. International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association. 2002. DOI: 10.1046/j.1442-2042.2002.00529.x.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.