Effects of Sativex® Versus Placebo on Glucagon-like Peptide-1, Total Ghrelin, and Subjective Appetite in Older Adults with Poor Appetite: A Protocolized Secondary Analysis of a Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Crossover Trial.

BACKGROUND

Poor appetite, a major contributor to malnutrition, is highly prevalent among older adults and associated with adverse clinical outcomes. Nevertheless, there are currently no widely accepted or consistently effective pharmacological treatments targeting appetite that are routinely recommended alongside nutritional interventions. Medical cannabis has been proposed as a potential appetite stimulant in older adults with poor appetite through modulation of appetite-regulating hormones such as glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and total ghrelin, but the evidence remains limited.

AIMS: To investigate the effects of Sativex® versus placebo on postprandial GLP-1 and total ghrelin concentrations following a single dose (8.1 mg Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and 7.5 mg cannabidiol (CBD)), and on subjective appetite following two separated doses, in older adults with poor appetite, and to investigate the associations between plasma concentrations of THC and its metabolites on these outcomes.

METHODS

This protocolized secondary analysis included 17 participants (≥65 years) with poor appetite from a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled crossover trial. Participants received Sativex® or placebo on two separate study days. GLP-1 and total ghrelin were measured following one dose of Sativex®/placebo and a standardized breakfast, and subjective appetite was assessed repeatedly using visual analog scales throughout the administration of two separate doses of Sativex®/placebo, the consumption of a standardized breakfast, and an ad libitum lunch meal. Effects/associations were analyzed using linear mixed-effects models.

RESULTS

Compared with placebo, Sativex® produced an estimated 2.38 pmol/L (95% confidence intervals (CI): -0.71 to 5.46; Bonferroni-corrected p = 0.274) reduction in mean GLP-1 and time-dependent changes in mean total ghrelin (Bonferroni-corrected p = 0.054). Compared with placebo, Sativex® produced minimal changes in separate subjective appetite sensations (all Bonferroni-corrected p = 1.00) and a slightly lower combined appetite score (-5.2 mm; 95% CI: -24.4 to 4.0; Bonferroni-corrected p = 1.00). Increased plasma concentrations of THC and metabolites were associated with reduced estimates of mean GLP-1 concentrations and subjective appetite, as well as increased mean total ghrelin concentrations. However, no statistically significant differences were detected for any analyses, and estimates had wide CIs, warranting cautious interpretation.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, no statistically significant differences were detected between Sativex® and placebo in postprandial GLP-1, total ghrelin, or subjective appetite over time in older adults with poor appetite. Similarly, no statistically significant associations were observed between plasma concentrations of THC and its metabolites and GLP-1, total ghrelin, or subjective appetite.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT05503147; EudraCT nr.: 2021-002318-15.