MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/s0266-7681(98)80186-1

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of hand surgery (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 1998

The treatment of fractures of the ring and little metacarpal necks. A prospective randomized study of three different types of treatment.

Hansen P B, Hansen T B

Клиническое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

A total of 105 patients with fracture of the neck of the ring or little metacarpal bone were randomized to receive three different types of treatment: dorso-ulnar plaster-of-Paris from the proximal interphalangeal joint to elbow; functional brace around the wrist; or elastic bandage. Twenty patients (19%) had to be excluded for different reasons leaving 85 patients in the study. The remaining patients were examined after 4 weeks and 3 months. There was no difference in patient satisfaction between the three different types of treatment. The functional brace was in our opinion superior to the two other types of treatment: the patients had as little pain as the patients treated with plaster-of-Paris and less pain than patients treated with elastic bandage. Patients treated with a functional brace mobilized as fast as patients treated with elastic bandage and faster than patients treated with plaster-of-Paris. Based on these findings, we recommend the functional brace for treatment of fractures of the neck of the ring and little metacarpals.

Для цитирования: Hansen P B, Hansen T B. The treatment of fractures of the ring and little metacarpal necks. A prospective randomized study of three different types of treatment.. Journal of hand surgery (Edinburgh, Scotland). 1998. DOI: 10.1016/s0266-7681(98)80186-1.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.