MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.01.009

Медицинская библиотека · American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2017

Skin closure at cesarean delivery, glue vs subcuticular sutures: a randomized controlled trial.

Daykan Yair, Sharon-Weiner Maya, Pasternak Yael, Tzadikevitch-Geffen Keren, Markovitch Ofer, Sukenik-Halevy Rivka, Biron-Shental Tal

СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The optimal choice of skin closure at cesarean delivery has not yet been determined.

OBJECTIVE

This study compared wound complications and scar healing following cesarean delivery between 2 methods of skin closure: glue (Dermabond; Ethicon, Somerville, NJ) and monofilament (Monocryl; Ethicon) epidermal sutures.

STUDY

DESIGN

We conducted a randomized controlled trial in which pregnant women undergoing a scheduled cesarean delivery were randomly assigned to skin (epidermis) closure with glue or with a monofilament synthetic suture. The subcutaneous tissue was sutured for all patients. Outcome assessors were blinded to group allocation. Scars were evaluated >8 weeks. Primary outcome measures were Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale scores. Secondary outcome measures were surgeon satisfaction, duration of surgery, duration of hospitalization after the cesarean delivery, and complications of surgical site infection or wound disruption (hematoma or seroma). A sample of 104 women was needed to achieve a clinically significant effect with a power of 80%.

RESULTS

Demographic characteristics, patients' clinical background, prepregnancy body mass index, and subcutaneous thickness were similar in both groups. Length of surgery between the groups (37 ± 10 minutes for glue vs 39 ± 13 minutes for sutures, P = .515) was similar. Scores immediately after the wound closure were similar for both groups regarding surgeons' time estimate of closure (P = .181) and closure appearance (P = .082). Surgeons' satisfaction with the technique was significantly higher in the suture group (P = .003). No significant differences were found between the groups in blood loss, surgical site infection, length of postpartum hospitalization, or wound disruption. Glue and suture skin closure scores using Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale were similar 8 weeks after surgery, at P = .710 for patients and P = .568 for a physician observer.

CONCLUSION

Skin closure using glue or a monofilament synthetic suture had similar results. Both methods were shown to be safe and successful for skin closure after a scheduled cesarean delivery and, therefore, can be used based on surgeon and patient preferences.

Для цитирования: Daykan Yair, Sharon-Weiner Maya, Pasternak Yael, Tzadikevitch-Geffen Keren, Markovitch Ofer, Sukenik-Halevy Rivka, Biron-Shental Tal. Skin closure at cesarean delivery, glue vs subcuticular sutures: a randomized controlled trial.. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.01.009.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.