MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1055/s-2007-999777

Медицинская библиотека · American journal of perinatology · 1987

Intracranial hemorrhage in low-birth-weight twins during neonatal period.

Dincsoy M Y, Kim Y M, Ponce E, Williams H, Naroji S K

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Since twins have a higher incidence of premature birth, fetal distress, asphyxia and other pre- and intrapartum high-risk factors, it is reasonable to expect that they may be vulnerable to intracranial hemorrhage. Forty-seven pairs of low-birth-weight twins were studied during the newborn period by serial cranial ultrasound. The comparisons of groups, based on birth order, relative size of the neonates, and the mode of delivery, showed no significant differences in the incidence of intracranial hemorrhage between first and second twins, smaller and larger twins, or vaginal and cesarean delivery. However, the comparison based on the presentation of the infant revealed a significantly higher number of intracranial hemorrhages within the first week of life in the breech group than in the cephalic presentation group. The adverse effect of breech presentation on intracranial hemorrhage did not appear to be mediated by the well recognized risk factors such as lower gestational age, lower Apgar scores, and higher incidence of respiratory distress syndrome and assisted ventilation. Since most of the twins with ICH had breech presentation and were delivered by cesarean section, this mode of delivery does not seem to protect the twins with breech presentation from intracranial hemorrhage.

Для цитирования: Dincsoy M Y, Kim Y M, Ponce E, Williams H, Naroji S K. Intracranial hemorrhage in low-birth-weight twins during neonatal period.. American journal of perinatology. 1987. DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-999777.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.