Brain impairment : a multidisciplinary journal of the Australian Society for the Study of Brain Impairment · 2026
Validating telehealth assessment of physical concussion symptoms.
СтатьяВалидационное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Macheras Stephanie, Peverill Tess, McKay Adam, Ponsford Jennie, Russell Trevor, Davies Katie
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Telehealth could expand access to specialised concussion care; however, physiotherapists report low confidence in assessing physical symptoms remotely. This study adapted measures of vestibular, oculomotor, cervical and autonomic function for telehealth delivery, and evaluated their feasibility and comparability with in-person assessment.
METHODS: Using a repeated-measures design, 16 participants with concussion and 20 controls completed assessment modalities in random order (3 × 4 block randomisation). Feasibility was evaluated through completion rates, technical issues, adverse events and clinician feedback. Concurrent validity was examined using percentage agreement, Cohen's kappa, and sensitivity and specificity analyses.
RESULTS: Telehealth assessment was feasible; most concussion participants and all controls completed the protocols, there were minimal technical issues, no adverse events and shorter administration times. Clinicians reported high usability and efficiency. High agreement and sensitivity were observed across vestibular, ocular convergence, autonomic and cervical range of motion measures. Nuanced assessment of ocular smooth pursuits showed lower agreement, and a potential ceiling effect on autonomic assessment was identified.
CONCLUSION: This study preliminarily supports the feasibility and comparability of telehealth compared with in-person physical concussion assessments. Assessment of smooth pursuits and autonomic function require protocol refinement to enhance accuracy. Replication in larger samples is required to establish comparability.
METHODS: Using a repeated-measures design, 16 participants with concussion and 20 controls completed assessment modalities in random order (3 × 4 block randomisation). Feasibility was evaluated through completion rates, technical issues, adverse events and clinician feedback. Concurrent validity was examined using percentage agreement, Cohen's kappa, and sensitivity and specificity analyses.
RESULTS: Telehealth assessment was feasible; most concussion participants and all controls completed the protocols, there were minimal technical issues, no adverse events and shorter administration times. Clinicians reported high usability and efficiency. High agreement and sensitivity were observed across vestibular, ocular convergence, autonomic and cervical range of motion measures. Nuanced assessment of ocular smooth pursuits showed lower agreement, and a potential ceiling effect on autonomic assessment was identified.
CONCLUSION: This study preliminarily supports the feasibility and comparability of telehealth compared with in-person physical concussion assessments. Assessment of smooth pursuits and autonomic function require protocol refinement to enhance accuracy. Replication in larger samples is required to establish comparability.