Harefuah · 1989
[Renal colic and renal calculus].
Сравнительное исследованиеАннотация на английскомСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Siegel Y, Korczak D, Asherov J, Lindner A
Аннотация
A positive diagnosis of urinary stone was made in 183 of 407 patients (44.9%) with renal colic seen in the emergency room. 182 (44.7%) had normal intravenous pyelograms, 26 (6.4%) had evidence of dilatation of the urinary system, possibly due to the passage of a stone, and 16 (3.9%) had other pathological urinary conditions, such as double collecting system or cysts. Stones were located in the upper urinary tract in 28.4%, in the midureter in 21.9%, and in the lower ureter in 49.7%. There was a statistically significant correlation between recurrent episodes of left-sided renal colic, erythrocytes in the urine and the presence of a stone in the urinary tract. No ethnic differences were found, nor was there a difference in the rates of stones found in those who were hospitalized and in those who were not.