BMC surgery · 2024
Results of innervated digital artery perforator flap and direct-flow homodigital flap application in fingertip soft tissue amputations.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Atilgan Numan, Duman Numan
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to compare the results of the innervated digital artery perforator (IDAP) flap and the direct-flow homodigital flap as reconstruction methods for fingertip soft tissue amputations. This issue is important in hand surgery, and we aim to identify the method that provides the best functional and cosmetic outcomes.
METHODS: Between 2020 and 2022, 32 patients with fingertip amputations were reconstructed by the same surgeon using two different methods. The patients were retrospectively divided into two groups: those who underwent IDAP (n = 14) and those who had a direct-flow homodigital flap (n = 18). We compared the groups in terms of defect size, cold intolerance, venous congestion, Sollerman hand function test scores, Seddon sensory test scores, and follow-up periods, as well as flap viability, flexion contracture, and static two-point discrimination (s2PD).
RESULTS: Of the 32 patients (26 men, 6 females; age: mean 28.72 ± 11.5 years), the injuries were caused by different mechanisms, including sharp (57.1% IDAP), crush (75% IDAP) and entanglement (66.7% homodigital). The average area of tissue loss was approximately 2.70 ± 1.37 cm², while the average s2PD measurement was approximately 4.94 ± 1.04 mm. Postoperatively, the Seddon sensory test results for the homodigital flap group were S4 (61.5%), S3 (23.1%), S3+ (7.7%), and S2 (7.7%), compared to the IDAP group, which showed S4 (57.9%), S3+ (21.1%), and S3 (21.1%). Complications occurred in five patients, though no flap loss or revision was required. The postoperative mean Sollerman hand function scores were higher for the homodigital group than for the IDAP group, with values of 75 ± 2.64 and 73 ± 3.34, respectively. Although not statistically significant, the results numerically suggest that the IDAP flap is better in terms of sensory recovery and hand function compared to the homodigital flap (p > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: This is the first investigation to compare direct-flow flaps with IDAP. The average follow-up period for patients who underwent homodigital surgery was also shorter than that of the IDAP group. Furthermore, the mean postoperative two-point discrimination and postoperative Sollerman function score were higher in patients who had homodigital surgery.
METHODS: Between 2020 and 2022, 32 patients with fingertip amputations were reconstructed by the same surgeon using two different methods. The patients were retrospectively divided into two groups: those who underwent IDAP (n = 14) and those who had a direct-flow homodigital flap (n = 18). We compared the groups in terms of defect size, cold intolerance, venous congestion, Sollerman hand function test scores, Seddon sensory test scores, and follow-up periods, as well as flap viability, flexion contracture, and static two-point discrimination (s2PD).
RESULTS: Of the 32 patients (26 men, 6 females; age: mean 28.72 ± 11.5 years), the injuries were caused by different mechanisms, including sharp (57.1% IDAP), crush (75% IDAP) and entanglement (66.7% homodigital). The average area of tissue loss was approximately 2.70 ± 1.37 cm², while the average s2PD measurement was approximately 4.94 ± 1.04 mm. Postoperatively, the Seddon sensory test results for the homodigital flap group were S4 (61.5%), S3 (23.1%), S3+ (7.7%), and S2 (7.7%), compared to the IDAP group, which showed S4 (57.9%), S3+ (21.1%), and S3 (21.1%). Complications occurred in five patients, though no flap loss or revision was required. The postoperative mean Sollerman hand function scores were higher for the homodigital group than for the IDAP group, with values of 75 ± 2.64 and 73 ± 3.34, respectively. Although not statistically significant, the results numerically suggest that the IDAP flap is better in terms of sensory recovery and hand function compared to the homodigital flap (p > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: This is the first investigation to compare direct-flow flaps with IDAP. The average follow-up period for patients who underwent homodigital surgery was also shorter than that of the IDAP group. Furthermore, the mean postoperative two-point discrimination and postoperative Sollerman function score were higher in patients who had homodigital surgery.