Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2022
Utility of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy: Raising the Bar in Chest Masculinization Surgery.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Abu El Hawa Areeg A, Dekker Paige K, Mizher Rami, Orra Susan, Fan Kenneth L, Del Corral Gabriel
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Prophylactic use of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) has been shown to decrease the incidence of postoperative complications. This study aimed to evaluate the utility of NPWT in chest masculinization with free nipple graft (FNG).
METHODS: All consecutive male patients undergoing chest masculinization with FNG by a single provider at a single center were reviewed. Postoperative treatment with either NPWT or standard wound care (SWC) defined this study's cohorts. Patient characteristics and postoperative complications were compared between patients receiving NPWT versus SWC.
RESULTS: One hundred thirty-one patients with 262 closed breast incisions (NPWT=72, SWC=190) met inclusion criteria. Overall complications were higher in the SWC cohort (n=80/190, 42%) compared to the NPWT cohort (n = 13/72, 18%, p < 0.001). The NPWT group had significantly lower rates of partial nipple graft loss (9/72, 12.5% versus 47/190, 24.7%, p = 0.031), seroma formation (1/72, 1.4% versus 15/190, 7.9%, p = 0.037), and nipple hypopigmentation (6/72, 8.3% versus 36/190, 18.9%, p = 0.024) when compared to the SWC cohort. Time to drain removal was significantly faster in the NPWT group (NPWT 7 days versus SWC 9 days, p ≤ 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients receiving NPWT over their closed incisions following chest masculinization with FNG were found to have significantly lower rates of partial nipple graft necrosis, seroma formation, and time to drain removal compared to those receiving SWC. Future prospective, randomized studies to further elucidate the role of NPWT in top surgery are warranted.
METHODS: All consecutive male patients undergoing chest masculinization with FNG by a single provider at a single center were reviewed. Postoperative treatment with either NPWT or standard wound care (SWC) defined this study's cohorts. Patient characteristics and postoperative complications were compared between patients receiving NPWT versus SWC.
RESULTS: One hundred thirty-one patients with 262 closed breast incisions (NPWT=72, SWC=190) met inclusion criteria. Overall complications were higher in the SWC cohort (n=80/190, 42%) compared to the NPWT cohort (n = 13/72, 18%, p < 0.001). The NPWT group had significantly lower rates of partial nipple graft loss (9/72, 12.5% versus 47/190, 24.7%, p = 0.031), seroma formation (1/72, 1.4% versus 15/190, 7.9%, p = 0.037), and nipple hypopigmentation (6/72, 8.3% versus 36/190, 18.9%, p = 0.024) when compared to the SWC cohort. Time to drain removal was significantly faster in the NPWT group (NPWT 7 days versus SWC 9 days, p ≤ 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients receiving NPWT over their closed incisions following chest masculinization with FNG were found to have significantly lower rates of partial nipple graft necrosis, seroma formation, and time to drain removal compared to those receiving SWC. Future prospective, randomized studies to further elucidate the role of NPWT in top surgery are warranted.