MedElevator
Войти в исследования The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians · 2014
Training needs in operative obstetrics for maternal-fetal medicine fellows.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Eichelberger Kacey Y, Bengtson Angela M, Tolleson-Rinehart Sue, Menard M Kathryn
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To define residual operative obstetric training needs for first-year maternal-fetal medicine (MFM) fellows.
METHODS: We administered a web-based survey to all 100 first-year fellows. We used descriptive statistics to report frequency data for 13 procedures, and logistic regression to estimate odds ratios for comfort in doing and teaching selected procedures.
RESULTS: Response rate was 86% (n = 86). Fellows who completed residency in the Northeast/Midatlantic (n = 26) were less likely to report comfort doing or teaching low forceps deliveries (OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.05, 0.78; and 0.20, 95% CI 0.04, 0.85, respectively), while those completing fellowship in the West (n = 13), reported more comfort performing breech extraction of a second twin (OR 6.84, 95% CI 1.24, 51.50); fellows completing residency in the Southeast formed the referent group. Fellows reporting completion of the three selected procedures >5 times each during residency were significantly more likely to report comfort doing and teaching them as fellows. Type of residency program (community/academic) was not significantly associated with reported comfort.
CONCLUSION: The wide range of operative obstetric experience fellows reported gaining in residency varies by region. Additional research is needed to understand competency and teaching ability for procedural skills, and many MFM fellows may need additional procedural experience.
METHODS: We administered a web-based survey to all 100 first-year fellows. We used descriptive statistics to report frequency data for 13 procedures, and logistic regression to estimate odds ratios for comfort in doing and teaching selected procedures.
RESULTS: Response rate was 86% (n = 86). Fellows who completed residency in the Northeast/Midatlantic (n = 26) were less likely to report comfort doing or teaching low forceps deliveries (OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.05, 0.78; and 0.20, 95% CI 0.04, 0.85, respectively), while those completing fellowship in the West (n = 13), reported more comfort performing breech extraction of a second twin (OR 6.84, 95% CI 1.24, 51.50); fellows completing residency in the Southeast formed the referent group. Fellows reporting completion of the three selected procedures >5 times each during residency were significantly more likely to report comfort doing and teaching them as fellows. Type of residency program (community/academic) was not significantly associated with reported comfort.
CONCLUSION: The wide range of operative obstetric experience fellows reported gaining in residency varies by region. Additional research is needed to understand competency and teaching ability for procedural skills, and many MFM fellows may need additional procedural experience.