MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/0300060518788247

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of international medical research · 2018

Retained surgical needle and gauze after cesarean section and adnexectomy: a case report and literature review.

Gavrić Lovrec Vida, Cokan Andrej, Lukman Lara, Arko Darja, Takač Iztok

Клинический случайСтатьяОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Although the incidence of retained surgical items (RSIs) is low, it is nevertheless an important preventable cause of patient injury that can ultimately lead to the patient's death and to subsequent high medical and legal costs. Unintentional RSI is the cause of 70% of re-interventions, with a morbidity of 80% and mortality of 35%. The most common RSIs are sponges or gauze (gossypiboma or textiloma), while retained surgical instruments and needles are rare. Perioperative counting of equipment and materials is the most common method of screening for RSIs, while a diagnosis can later be confirmed by the clinical appearance and by imaging studies. We present a rare case of a 43-year-old patient who was admitted to our hospital because of two retained needles following a cesarean section, despite several subsequent laparotomies. One needle had been removed previously, but in addition to the remaining needle, we also removed a retained gauze. The diagnosis of RSIs is extremely important, and safe surgical practices including the addition of new imaging technologies should be encouraged to detect RSIs.

Для цитирования: Gavrić Lovrec Vida, Cokan Andrej, Lukman Lara, Arko Darja, Takač Iztok. Retained surgical needle and gauze after cesarean section and adnexectomy: a case report and literature review.. The Journal of international medical research. 2018. DOI: 10.1177/0300060518788247.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.