United European gastroenterology journal · 2025
Rifaximin-α in Patients With Recurrent Episodes of Hepatic Encephalopathy Due to Cirrhosis Reduces Healthcare Utilization.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
van Doorn Diederick J, van Eekhout Kirsi M A, de Wit Koos, Baak L C, Klemt-Kropp Michael, Verwer Bart J, Friederich Philip, de Bruin Gijs J, Vos Xander G, Drenth Joost P H, Takkenberg R Bart
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Hepatic encephalopathy is a frequent complication of cirrhosis. Rifaximin-α has been included in guidelines for secondary prevention of hepatic encephalopathy, but there are few real-world data on its efficacy and impact on healthcare utilization. In this study, we aimed to assess the effect of rifaximin-α on healthcare utilization.
METHOD: We conducted a cohort analysis in patients from seven hospitals in the Netherlands, who received rifaximin-α as secondary prophylaxis for hepatic encephalopathy. Data were compared 6 months before and 6 months after the prescription of rifaximin-α. The primary endpoint was the effect of rifaximin-α on healthcare utilization. Secondary endpoint was the effect of rifaximin-α on healthcare costs.
RESULTS: We included 126 patients (65% male; median age 68) with a median Model for End-stage Liver Disease score of 15. The mean number of hepatic encephalopathy episodes after starting rifaximin-α was lower than before starting rifaximin-α (0.9 vs. 2.2; p < 0.001). Mean healthcare utilization decreased from 6.1 contacts in the 6 months before rifaximin-α to 3.3 contacts in the 6 months after starting rifaximin-α (p < 0.001). The mean number of hospital admissions decreased from 1.7 admissions per patient to 1.0 admissions after starting rifaximin-α (p < 0.001). The mean number of outpatient visits also decreased after starting rifaximin-α (2.4 visits per patient to 1.7; p = 0.001). Annual costs per patient before starting rifaximin-α were €13,320. This was similar to the costs after rifaximin-α was prescribed (€13,120).
CONCLUSION: Rifaximin-α significantly reduced the number of episodes of hepatic encephalopathy, the number of hospital admissions as well as the number of outpatient and emergency department visits, contributing to a reduction in healthcare utilization. There was no reduction in overall costs.
METHOD: We conducted a cohort analysis in patients from seven hospitals in the Netherlands, who received rifaximin-α as secondary prophylaxis for hepatic encephalopathy. Data were compared 6 months before and 6 months after the prescription of rifaximin-α. The primary endpoint was the effect of rifaximin-α on healthcare utilization. Secondary endpoint was the effect of rifaximin-α on healthcare costs.
RESULTS: We included 126 patients (65% male; median age 68) with a median Model for End-stage Liver Disease score of 15. The mean number of hepatic encephalopathy episodes after starting rifaximin-α was lower than before starting rifaximin-α (0.9 vs. 2.2; p < 0.001). Mean healthcare utilization decreased from 6.1 contacts in the 6 months before rifaximin-α to 3.3 contacts in the 6 months after starting rifaximin-α (p < 0.001). The mean number of hospital admissions decreased from 1.7 admissions per patient to 1.0 admissions after starting rifaximin-α (p < 0.001). The mean number of outpatient visits also decreased after starting rifaximin-α (2.4 visits per patient to 1.7; p = 0.001). Annual costs per patient before starting rifaximin-α were €13,320. This was similar to the costs after rifaximin-α was prescribed (€13,120).
CONCLUSION: Rifaximin-α significantly reduced the number of episodes of hepatic encephalopathy, the number of hospital admissions as well as the number of outpatient and emergency department visits, contributing to a reduction in healthcare utilization. There was no reduction in overall costs.