The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research · 2015
Randomized trial of ultrasound-indicated cerclage in singleton women without lower genital tract inflammation.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Otsuki Katsufumi, Nakai Akihito, Matsuda Yoshio, Shinozuka Norio, Kawabata Ikuno, Makino Yasuo, Kamei Yoshimasa, Iwashita Mitsutoshi, Okai Takashi
Аннотация
AIM: This is the first report of a randomized trial of cerclage on pure cervical shortening without vaginosis or cervicitis. The objective of our multicenter randomized controlled trial was to assess the benefits of ultrasound-indicated cervical cerclage in the mid-trimester to prevent preterm birth in women who have no signs of infection or inflammation of the lower genital tract.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Women with a short cervical length < 25 mm between 16 and 26 weeks of gestation were randomly assigned to receive a Shirodkar cerclage, McDonald cerclage, or bedrest (no cerclage). Before being randomly assigned to one of the three groups, all women were screened for infection/inflammation of the lower genital tract; those with positive results were excluded from the study. The ratio of preterm delivery as a primary end-point was evaluated in the groups.
RESULTS: A total of 106 singleton patients with a short cervical length were assessed for study eligibility; 106 patients were randomized to the three treatment options. Ultimately, 98 patients (in the Shirodkar [n = 34], McDonald [n = 34] and bedrest [n = 30] groups) were analyzed. No differences in preterm delivery or perinatal outcomes were found between the three groups. Significantly fewer patients in the Shirodkar group required hospitalization for treatment of threatened preterm labor when compared to patients in the bedrest group.
CONCLUSION: For women with a short cervical length < 25 mm between 16 and 26 weeks of gestation, Shirodkar cerclage might be considered to reduce the occurrence of threatened preterm labor.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Women with a short cervical length < 25 mm between 16 and 26 weeks of gestation were randomly assigned to receive a Shirodkar cerclage, McDonald cerclage, or bedrest (no cerclage). Before being randomly assigned to one of the three groups, all women were screened for infection/inflammation of the lower genital tract; those with positive results were excluded from the study. The ratio of preterm delivery as a primary end-point was evaluated in the groups.
RESULTS: A total of 106 singleton patients with a short cervical length were assessed for study eligibility; 106 patients were randomized to the three treatment options. Ultimately, 98 patients (in the Shirodkar [n = 34], McDonald [n = 34] and bedrest [n = 30] groups) were analyzed. No differences in preterm delivery or perinatal outcomes were found between the three groups. Significantly fewer patients in the Shirodkar group required hospitalization for treatment of threatened preterm labor when compared to patients in the bedrest group.
CONCLUSION: For women with a short cervical length < 25 mm between 16 and 26 weeks of gestation, Shirodkar cerclage might be considered to reduce the occurrence of threatened preterm labor.