The prevalence of rotator cuff pathology in the setting of acute proximal biceps tendon rupture.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
The prevalence and severity of concomitant rotator cuff pathology in the setting of proximal biceps tendon ruptures are poorly understood. Concomitant rotator cuff disease may have important implications in the prognosis and natural history of this shoulder condition. Therefore, an observational cohort of patients with an acute rupture of the long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) was evaluated to determine the prevalence and severity of concomitant rotator cuff disease.
METHODS
Thirty consecutive patients diagnosed with acute proximal biceps tendon rupture were prospectively enrolled. Magnetic resonance imaging of the affected shoulder was obtained in 27 patients and reviewed by a fellowship-trained orthopedic surgeon.
RESULTS
The cohort consisted of 20 men (74%) and 7 women (26%) (mean age, 61.0 years [range, 42-78 years]). The dominant side was involved in 20 injuries (74%), and a low-energy trauma mechanism of injury was involved in 23 (85%). Of the patients, 11 (41%) reported a history of antecedent shoulder pain. Magnetic resonance imaging assessment revealed that 93% of patients had evidence of rotator cuff disease, including 13 full-thickness tears. Of the full-thickness tears, 3 were small, 6 medium, 2 large, and 2 massive. Pathology of the subscapularis tendon was identified in 7 patients (26%).
CONCLUSION
In this cohort, we found LHBT rupture to be highly correlated with the presence of rotator cuff disease, with the majority of patients presenting with full-thickness tears of the supraspinatus. These findings may have important implications in the treatment and prognosis of patients who present with acute LHBT ruptures.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.