MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2025.101824

Медицинская библиотека · American journal of obstetrics & gynecology MFM · 2025

Expectant management versus selective fetal reduction in dichorionic-diamniotic twins following mid-trimester, preterm premature rupture of membranes in 1 twin: Review of literature and meta-analysis.

Arbib Nissim, Shmueli Anat, Barbash-Hazan Shiri, Tzadikevitch-Geffen Keren, Miremberg Hadas, Kolp-Asis Shany, Tenenbaum-Gavish Kinneret, Gielchinsky Yuval, Hadar Eran

СтатьяМетаанализСистематический обзорСравнительное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To compare maternal and neonatal outcomes following selective fetal reduction versus expectant management in dichorionic-diamniotic twin pregnancies complicated by mid-trimester preterm premature rupture of membranes in 1 sac.

DATA SOURCES: A systematic literature search of PubMed, Embase, and Scopus was conducted through March 2025.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Included studies were observational (case series or cohort studies) comparing selective fetal reduction versus expectant management in twin pregnancies with mid-trimester preterm premature rupture of membranes (prior to 24+0 weeks). Only studies reporting relevant maternal or neonatal outcomes were included.

STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS

METHODS

Studies were assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Meta-analyses were performed using random- or fixed-effects models based on heterogeneity. Outcomes included perinatal survival, neonatal survival, latency period, gestational age at delivery, delivery ≥32 weeks, and other maternal and neonatal complications.

RESULTS

Five retrospective studies met eligibility criteria, and 4 were included in the meta-analysis. Neonatal survival was higher with selective fetal reduction (74% vs 69%), though not statistically significant (OR=1.72, 95% CI=0.96-4.25). Perinatal survival was significantly lower with selective fetal reduction (33% vs 69%), when the reduced fetuses were included (OR=0.40, 95% CI=0.19-0.8). Selective fetal reduction significantly increased odds of delivery ≥32 weeks (67.4% vs 11.3%; OR=15.34, 95% CI=3.86-61.03). Latency and mean gestational age at delivery trended higher in the reduction group but did not reach statistical significance. Maternal and neonatal complications - including chorioamnionitis, cesarean delivery and respiratory morbidity - were less frequent following selective reduction, except for pulmonary hypoplasia, which was higher.

CONCLUSIONS

Selective fetal reduction after mid-trimester rupture in 1 sac of dichorionic-diamniotic twins increases the likelihood of delivery ≥32 weeks. Although most other outcome differences were not significant, these findings suggest that fetal reduction may be an alternative to expectant management when termination of the entire pregnancy is not optional.

Для цитирования: Arbib Nissim, Shmueli Anat, Barbash-Hazan Shiri, Tzadikevitch-Geffen Keren, Miremberg Hadas, Kolp-Asis Shany, Tenenbaum-Gavish Kinneret, Gielchinsky Yuval, Hadar Eran. Expectant management versus selective fetal reduction in dichorionic-diamniotic twins following mid-trimester, preterm premature rupture of membranes in 1 twin: Review of literature and meta-analysis.. American journal of obstetrics & gynecology MFM. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2025.101824.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.