MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.5455/medarh.2012.66.412-414

Медицинская библиотека · Medical archives (Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina) · 2012

Risk of uterine rupture following locked vs unlocked single-layer closure.

Hudic Igor, Bujold Emmanuel, Fatusic Zlatan, Roberge Stéphanie, Mandzic Amer, Fatusic Jasenko

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To compare the rate of uterine scar disruption after a locked versus an unlocked single-layer closure of the hysterotomy incision at a previous cesarean.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study in a population where both locked and unlocked single-layer closure are commonly used. All singleton pregnancies at 24 weeks' gestation or more with a previous single cesarean were included. Rate of uterine scar disruption (complete uterine rupture and uterine scar dehiscence) were compared between women with a previous locked and those with a previous unlocked single-layer closure of the uterus.

RESULTS

Out of 388 women included in the study, 272 had a previous unlocked single-layer closure and 116 had a locked single-layer closure. We found no significant difference in the rate of uterine scar disruption between the two groups (5.9% vs 8.6%, p = 0.32).

CONCLUSION

Locking a single-layer closure was not associated with an increase rate of uterine scar disruption at the next pregnancy in our retrospective analysis. A randomized trial should be performed.

Для цитирования: Hudic Igor, Bujold Emmanuel, Fatusic Zlatan, Roberge Stéphanie, Mandzic Amer, Fatusic Jasenko. Risk of uterine rupture following locked vs unlocked single-layer closure.. Medical archives (Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina). 2012. DOI: 10.5455/medarh.2012.66.412-414.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.