DOI 10.14989/actauroljap_68_3_91
[A Case of Successful Selective Arterial Embolization for Traumatic Priapism].
Аннотация
The first-line treatment for arterial (traumatic) priapism is follow-up, but no recommended duration has been established. We report a case of traumatic priapism that did not improve after one year of follow-up and was cured by arterial embolization. The patient was a 21-year-old male with a urethral injury caused by traffic trauma, and a urethral catheter was placed under fluoroscopic guidance. Magnetic resonance imaging (T2-weighted image) showed a low-signal area in the right penile corpus cavernosum. The urethral catheter was removed 1 month after the injury, but the erection persisted, and the patient was referred to our department 8 months after the injury. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) revealed enhancement effect of the right penile corpus cavernosum, which was diagnosed as traumatic priapism, and selective arterial embolization was performed 1 year after the injury. Angiography revealed an extravascular leak from the right patent ductus arteriosus into the cavernous sinus of the penis, and a gelatin sponge (Serescue®︎) was injected as an embolization material into the distal portion of the right patent ductus arteriosus. Immediately after the operation, the penis became fully erect, but gradually softened. One month after embolization, priapism improved, and 6 months after embolization, contrast-enhanced CT confirmed the disappearance of the enhancement effect of the right corpus cavernosum. There has been no relapse of symptoms for 10 months after embolization. Selective arterial embolization for traumatic priapism is considered to be a useful treatment even after a certain period of follow-up.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.