Home-like versus conventional institutional settings for birth.

BACKGROUND

Many home-like birth centres have been established near conventional labour wards for the care of pregnant women who prefer and require little or no medical intervention during labour and birth.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this review was to assess the effects of care in a home-like birth environment compared to care in a conventional labour ward, on labour and birth outcomes.

SEARCH STRATEGY: The Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group trials register was searched.

SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised and quasi-randomised trials comparing a home-like institutional birth environment to conventional hospital care for pregnant women at low risk of obstetric complications.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Trial quality was assessed.

MAIN

RESULTS

Five trials involving almost 8000 women were included. Substantial numbers of women allocated to home-like settings were transferred to standard care before or during labour, making interpretation of results difficult. Allocation to a home-like setting was associated with lower rates of intrapartum analgesia/anaesthesia (odds ratio 0.82, 95% confidence interval 0.72 to 0.93), fetal heart rate abnormalities (0.72, 95% confidence interval 0.63 to 0.81), augmented labour, and immobility during labour, as well as greater satisfaction with care, and increased likelihood of sore nipples and mastitis. There was a non-statistically significant trend towards higher perinatal mortality in the home-like setting (odds ratio 1.49, 95% confidence interval 0.79 to 2.78).

REVIEWER'S

CONCLUSIONS

There appear to be some benefits from home-like settings for childbirth, although increased support from caregivers may be more important. Caregivers and clients in home-like settings need to watch for signs of complications.