MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.ogc.2006.05.012

Медицинская библиотека · Obstetrics and gynecology clinics of North America · 2006

Thrombophilia and recurrent pregnancy loss.

Carp Howard J A

СтатьяОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Many unanswered questions regarding thrombophilia and recurrent pregnancy loss exist. For example, does a true association exist? Are thrombotic mechanisms relevant? Is a second messenger necessary to cause the manifestation of thrombosis? At present it seems that thrombophilia are associated with and may even cause some cases of pregnancy loss. The role of treatment remains to be determined. Although the aim of physicians working in this field is entirely laudable, to allow childless couples to have children, it is necessary to have good evidence of effect before treatment is given to all patients. A serious ethical dilemma remains, however, namely should treatment that may be effective be denied to patients who have prior pregnancy losses? Denial of treatment is extremely distressing for the patient and the physician. The author's own practice is to offer treatment after a full explanation, particularly because treatment is generally prescribed in the antiphospholipid syndrome and justified in hereditary thrombophilias according to the report of Carp and colleagues, showing a 25% improvement in live birth rates in treated patients. When treatment fails, however, the embryo should be karyotyped to exclude chromosomal aberrations.

Для цитирования: Carp Howard J A. Thrombophilia and recurrent pregnancy loss.. Obstetrics and gynecology clinics of North America. 2006. DOI: 10.1016/j.ogc.2006.05.012.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.