MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1080/00365540410025348

Медицинская библиотека · Scandinavian journal of infectious diseases · 2004

Timeliness of case reporting in the Swedish statutory surveillance of communicable diseases 1998--2002.

Jansson Anna, Arneborn Malin, Skärlund Katarina, Ekdahl Karl

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

To prepare for a new communicable disease act in Sweden, we performed an in-depth analysis of the performance of the present notification system (1998--2002). Four diseases were selected for analysis (meningococcal infection, salmonellosis, infection with penicillin-resistant pneumococci and tularaemia). Each step in the double notification flow (clinical and laboratory notifications) was studied and paper-based and electronic notifications compared. More than 15 possible single dates in the notification flows were analysed for 27,000 cases. The shortest notification flows (from date of sample collection to when the first notification was received at SMI--clinical or laboratory notification) were seen for meningococcal infections and salmonellosis (median 7 d) and the longest for tularaemia (11 d). Laboratory notifications were faster than clinical notifications, and electronic reporting 1.5-1.7 times faster than paper notifications. Further gains should be expected from the new electronic reporting system (SmiNet2), which will allow also clinical reporting electronically over the internet.

Для цитирования: Jansson Anna, Arneborn Malin, Skärlund Katarina, Ekdahl Karl. Timeliness of case reporting in the Swedish statutory surveillance of communicable diseases 1998--2002.. Scandinavian journal of infectious diseases. 2004. DOI: 10.1080/00365540410025348.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.