The Israel Medical Association journal : IMAJ · 2004
Continence and quality of life assessment after artificial urinary sphincter implantation.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Gnessin Ehud, Livne Pinhas M, Baniel Jack, Gillon Gabriel
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Sphincter-related incontinence after radical prostatectomy, benign prostatectomy or due to neurogenic disease has a considerable negative impact on quality of life. Artificial urinary sphincter implantation is a mainstay therapeutic option for these patients.
OBJECTIVES: To assess patient satisfaction, subjective long-term continence and complications after AMS 800 artificial urinary sphincter implantation.
METHODS: The medical records of 34 patients who underwent artificial urinary sphincter implantation for radical prostatectomy (n = 23), simple prostatectomy (n = 9) or neurogenic disease (n = 2) between 1995 and 2003 were studied retrospectively. Median follow-up was 49 months (range 3-102 months). Records were analyzed for urinary sphincter survival and complications. Quality of life and continence assessment was done by mailing an impact questionnaire.
RESULTS: In 4 of the 34 patients (11.7%) the device was removed due to infection. One of the four had surgical revision elsewhere, and the other three were not interested in re-implantation of the device. Two patients (5.9%) underwent revisions due to mechanical failure. One patient died and three patients were not located. Twenty-seven out of a possible 30 patients (88%) completed the questionnaire; 22 (85%) achieved social continence (0-2 pads daily), and one patient had subjective difficulty activating the device. Subjective improvement and patient satisfaction was rated as 4.22 and 4.11, respectively (scale 0 to 5).
CONCLUSIONS: Artificial urinary sphincter implantation is an efficacious option for sphincter-related incontinence. This study documents the positive impact of artificial urinary sphincter implantation on quality of life with acceptable complications; these results are comparable to other published studies.
OBJECTIVES: To assess patient satisfaction, subjective long-term continence and complications after AMS 800 artificial urinary sphincter implantation.
METHODS: The medical records of 34 patients who underwent artificial urinary sphincter implantation for radical prostatectomy (n = 23), simple prostatectomy (n = 9) or neurogenic disease (n = 2) between 1995 and 2003 were studied retrospectively. Median follow-up was 49 months (range 3-102 months). Records were analyzed for urinary sphincter survival and complications. Quality of life and continence assessment was done by mailing an impact questionnaire.
RESULTS: In 4 of the 34 patients (11.7%) the device was removed due to infection. One of the four had surgical revision elsewhere, and the other three were not interested in re-implantation of the device. Two patients (5.9%) underwent revisions due to mechanical failure. One patient died and three patients were not located. Twenty-seven out of a possible 30 patients (88%) completed the questionnaire; 22 (85%) achieved social continence (0-2 pads daily), and one patient had subjective difficulty activating the device. Subjective improvement and patient satisfaction was rated as 4.22 and 4.11, respectively (scale 0 to 5).
CONCLUSIONS: Artificial urinary sphincter implantation is an efficacious option for sphincter-related incontinence. This study documents the positive impact of artificial urinary sphincter implantation on quality of life with acceptable complications; these results are comparable to other published studies.